MNTRX vs. EKJAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Allspring Core Bond Fund (MNTRX) and Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund (EKJAX).
MNTRX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Jun 30, 1997. EKJAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Jan 20, 1998.
Performance
MNTRX vs. EKJAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNTRX vs. EKJAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNTRX Allspring Core Bond Fund | -0.61% | 7.16% | 1.38% | 5.37% | -13.82% | -2.10% | 8.51% | 8.18% | -0.57% | 3.28% |
EKJAX Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund | -13.16% | 16.28% | 36.91% | 33.14% | -33.88% | 13.07% | 39.03% | 45.22% | 1.13% | 34.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNTRX achieves a -0.61% return, which is significantly higher than EKJAX's -13.16% return. Over the past 10 years, MNTRX has underperformed EKJAX with an annualized return of 1.43%, while EKJAX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.16% annualized return.
MNTRX
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -2.38%
- YTD
- -0.61%
- 6M
- 0.31%
- 1Y
- 3.61%
- 3Y*
- 3.30%
- 5Y*
- -0.13%
- 10Y*
- 1.43%
EKJAX
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- -10.80%
- YTD
- -13.16%
- 6M
- -15.55%
- 1Y
- 12.74%
- 3Y*
- 18.22%
- 5Y*
- 6.34%
- 10Y*
- 14.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MNTRX vs. EKJAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNTRX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than EKJAX's 1.11% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MNTRX vs. EKJAX — Risk / Return Rank
MNTRX
EKJAX
MNTRX vs. EKJAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Core Bond Fund (MNTRX) and Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund (EKJAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNTRX | EKJAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | 0.53 | +0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.24 | 0.91 | +0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.13 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 0.54 | +1.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.91 | 1.81 | +3.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNTRX | EKJAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 0.53 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 0.23 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.56 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.37 | +0.55 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNTRX and EKJAX is -0.12. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
MNTRX vs. EKJAX - Dividend Comparison
MNTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, less than EKJAX's 37.32% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNTRX Allspring Core Bond Fund | 3.75% | 4.07% | 4.13% | 3.19% | 1.85% | 1.75% | 6.35% | 2.46% | 2.33% | 1.74% | 1.97% | 1.45% |
EKJAX Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund | 37.32% | 32.41% | 20.46% | 40.04% | 0.00% | 27.04% | 12.00% | 16.22% | 21.24% | 28.36% | 11.30% | 7.21% |
Drawdowns
MNTRX vs. EKJAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNTRX drawdown since its inception was -19.36%, smaller than the maximum EKJAX drawdown of -59.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNTRX and EKJAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNTRX | EKJAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.36% | -59.70% | +40.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.82% | -18.10% | +15.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.91% | -50.43% | +31.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.36% | -50.43% | +31.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.01% | -18.10% | +14.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.45% | -20.68% | +18.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | 5.41% | -4.45% |
Volatility
MNTRX vs. EKJAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Allspring Core Bond Fund (MNTRX) is 1.58%, while Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund (EKJAX) has a volatility of 6.72%. This indicates that MNTRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EKJAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNTRX | EKJAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.58% | 6.72% | -5.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.69% | 13.71% | -11.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.41% | 23.62% | -19.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.00% | 27.92% | -21.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.94% | 25.30% | -20.36% |