PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNT.TO vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MNT.TO vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves (MNT.TO) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MNT.TO is traded in CAD, while AAPL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AAPL values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNT.TO achieves a -4.27% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's 13.15% return. Over the past 10 years, MNT.TO has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 13.28%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 30.82% annualized return.


MNT.TO

1D
-1.02%
1M
-9.25%
YTD
-4.27%
6M
-3.50%
1Y
25.55%
3Y*
31.93%
5Y*
20.66%
10Y*
13.28%

AAPL

1D
-1.62%
1M
5.03%
YTD
13.15%
6M
9.57%
1Y
51.47%
3Y*
20.81%
5Y*
22.88%
10Y*
30.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNT.TO vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MNT.TO
Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves
-4.27%61.23%44.81%3.61%10.52%-10.51%26.14%13.47%5.87%5.52%
AAPL
Apple Inc
13.15%4.07%41.77%45.46%-21.74%34.58%77.98%81.17%2.56%38.41%

Correlation

The correlation between MNT.TO and AAPL is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2012

-0.07

The correlation between MNT.TO and AAPL shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (10 years) to 0.05 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNT.TO vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNT.TO
MNT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
MNT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MNT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNT.TO vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves (MNT.TO) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MNT.TOAAPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.41

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

3.47

-2.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.62

8.00

-5.38

MNT.TO vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNT.TO and AAPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MNT.TOAAPLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

2.29

-1.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

0.82

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

1.04

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

1.08

-0.65

Drawdowns

MNT.TO vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNT.TO drawdown since its inception was -34.79%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -50.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNT.TO and AAPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNT.TOAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.79%

-50.16%

+15.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.01%

-14.90%

-10.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.01%

-33.90%

+8.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.01%

-33.90%

+8.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.58%

-34.96%

+1.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.70%

-3.61%

-20.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.84%

-10.17%

-5.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.78%

6.46%

+3.32%

Volatility

MNT.TO vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves (MNT.TO) is 4.65%, while Apple Inc (AAPL) has a volatility of 5.81%. This indicates that MNT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNT.TOAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.65%

5.81%

-1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.18%

16.27%

+8.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.27%

22.61%

+7.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.32%

28.21%

-7.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.58%

29.69%

-10.11%

Dividends

MNT.TO vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

MNT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.35%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
MNT.TO
Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MNT.TO and AAPL have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNT.TO and AAPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer