PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNS.TO vs. XPPE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MNS.TO vs. XPPE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves (MNS.TO) and Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum (EUR Hedged) ETC Securities (XPPE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MNS.TO is traded in CAD, while XPPE.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XPPE.DE values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNS.TO achieves a -22.97% return, which is significantly higher than XPPE.DE's -30.03% return.


MNS.TO

1D
2.91%
1M
-18.46%
YTD
-22.97%
6M
-26.52%
1Y
65.22%
3Y*
42.28%
5Y*
20.15%
10Y*

XPPE.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-17.51%
YTD
-30.03%
6M
-30.03%
1Y
14.44%
3Y*
20.44%
5Y*
6.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNS.TO vs. XPPE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MNS.TO
Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves
-22.97%161.12%41.73%-5.85%5.27%-15.46%35.99%
XPPE.DE
Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum (EUR Hedged) ETC Securities
-30.03%150.14%-8.69%-8.32%5.71%-18.77%30.39%

Correlation

The correlation between MNS.TO and XPPE.DE is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2020

0.46

The correlation between MNS.TO and XPPE.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.63 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNS.TO vs. XPPE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNS.TO
MNS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
MNS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
MNS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

XPPE.DE
XPPE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
XPPE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPPE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPPE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
XPPE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPPE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNS.TO vs. XPPE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves (MNS.TO) and Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum (EUR Hedged) ETC Securities (XPPE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MNS.TOXPPE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.09

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

0.31

+1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.21

0.67

+2.54

MNS.TO vs. XPPE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is higher than the XPPE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNS.TO and XPPE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MNS.TO vs. XPPE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNS.TO drawdown since its inception was -47.17%, roughly equal to the maximum XPPE.DE drawdown of -47.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNS.TO and XPPE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNS.TOXPPE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.17%

-47.94%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.17%

-45.78%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.17%

-45.78%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.17%

-45.78%

-1.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.80%

-45.69%

+2.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.78%

-26.68%

+8.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.35%

21.42%

-1.07%

Volatility

MNS.TO vs. XPPE.DE - Volatility Comparison

Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves (MNS.TO) has a higher volatility of 14.74% compared to Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum (EUR Hedged) ETC Securities (XPPE.DE) at 11.71%. This indicates that MNS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XPPE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNS.TOXPPE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.74%

11.71%

+3.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.69%

41.81%

+10.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.97%

48.83%

+7.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.55%

35.08%

-0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.23%

35.10%

-3.87%

MNS.TO vs. XPPE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNS.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than XPPE.DE's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

MNS.TO vs. XPPE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither MNS.TO nor XPPE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MNS.TO and XPPE.DE have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MNS.TO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MNS.TO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for XPPE.DE.

MNS.TO is categorized as Silver, while XPPE.DE is Precious Metals. MNS.TO tracks N/A (Physical Bullion), while XPPE.DE tracks Platinum (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Royal Canadian Mint and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for MNS.TO and 0.73% for XPPE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNS.TO and XPPE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer