MNS.TO vs. XGD.TO
MNS.TO (Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves) and XGD.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MNS.TO is a Silver fund tracking the N/A (Physical Bullion), while XGD.TO is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Morningstar Gbl Gold GR CAD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MNS.TO returned 16.17%/yr vs 14.79%/yr for XGD.TO. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MNS.TO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for XGD.TO.
Performance
MNS.TO vs. XGD.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNS.TO achieves a -8.40% return, which is significantly lower than XGD.TO's 3.35% return. Over the past 10 years, MNS.TO has outperformed XGD.TO with an annualized return of 16.17%, while XGD.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 14.79% annualized return.
MNS.TO
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- 1.76%
- YTD
- -8.40%
- 6M
- 21.27%
- 1Y
- 101.71%
- 3Y*
- 47.34%
- 5Y*
- 23.26%
- 10Y*
- 16.17%
XGD.TO
- 1D
- -2.80%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 3.35%
- 6M
- 8.72%
- 1Y
- 67.78%
- 3Y*
- 43.11%
- 5Y*
- 22.30%
- 10Y*
- 14.79%
MNS.TO vs. XGD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNS.TO Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves | -8.40% | 161.12% | 41.73% | -5.85% | 5.27% | -15.46% | 45.70% | 9.85% | -1.65% | -1.63% |
XGD.TO iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF | 3.35% | 144.45% | 19.63% | 3.91% | -3.10% | -5.81% | 21.10% | 40.18% | -4.10% | 0.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNS.TO and XGD.TO is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2012 | 0.52 |
The correlation between MNS.TO and XGD.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNS.TO vs. XGD.TO — Risk / Return Rank
MNS.TO
XGD.TO
MNS.TO vs. XGD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves (MNS.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNS.TO | XGD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.28 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 2.35 | +0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.94 | 6.22 | -0.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNS.TO | XGD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | 1.59 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.69 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.45 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.25 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
MNS.TO vs. XGD.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNS.TO drawdown since its inception was -51.12%, smaller than the maximum XGD.TO drawdown of -72.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNS.TO and XGD.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNS.TO | XGD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.12% | -72.55% | +21.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.31% | -28.95% | -9.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.31% | -28.95% | -9.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.31% | -40.82% | +2.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.02% | -46.96% | +4.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.98% | -23.49% | -8.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.15% | -28.30% | +0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.19% | 10.93% | +6.26% |
Volatility
MNS.TO vs. XGD.TO - Volatility Comparison
Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves (MNS.TO) has a higher volatility of 15.55% compared to iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO) at 14.43%. This indicates that MNS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XGD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNS.TO | XGD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.55% | 14.43% | +1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.13% | 34.40% | +17.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.03% | 42.86% | +11.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.67% | 32.64% | +2.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.05% | 33.38% | -1.33% |
MNS.TO vs. XGD.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNS.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than XGD.TO's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
MNS.TO vs. XGD.TO - Dividend Comparison
MNS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XGD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNS.TO Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XGD.TO iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF | 0.60% | 0.62% | 0.93% | 1.49% | 1.80% | 1.38% | 0.35% | 0.54% | 0.25% | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MNS.TO and XGD.TO have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MNS.TO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MNS.TO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for XGD.TO.
MNS.TO is categorized as Silver, while XGD.TO is Precious Metals. MNS.TO tracks N/A (Physical Bullion), while XGD.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl Gold GR CAD. They also come from different issuers: Royal Canadian Mint and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for MNS.TO and 0.61% for XGD.TO.
Find the right allocation for MNS.TO and XGD.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer