MNS.TO vs. NRJL.L

Last updated Jul 1, 2026

MNS.TO (Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves) and NRJL.L (Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - MNS.TO is a Silver fund tracking the N/A (Physical Bullion), while NRJL.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MNS.TO returned 20.15%/yr vs 4.95%/yr for NRJL.L. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MNS.TO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for NRJL.L.

Performance

MNS.TO vs. NRJL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves (MNS.TO) and Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

MNS.TO is traded in CAD, while NRJL.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the NRJL.L values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNS.TO achieves a -22.97% return, which is significantly lower than NRJL.L's 41.34% return.

MNS.TO

• 1D: 2.91%
• 1M: -18.46%
• YTD: -22.97%
• 6M: -26.52%
• 1Y: 65.22%
• 3Y*: 42.28%
• 5Y*: 20.15%
• 10Y*: —

NRJL.L

• 1D: 2.23%
• 1M: 1.27%
• YTD: 41.34%
• 6M: 40.48%
• 1Y: 79.33%
• 3Y*: 15.39%
• 5Y*: 4.95%
• 10Y*: 10.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNS.TO vs. NRJL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MNS.TO Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves	-22.97%	161.12%	41.73%	-5.85%	5.27%	-15.46%	45.70%	9.85%	-1.65%	-1.63%
NRJL.L Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist	41.34%	39.04%	-5.67%	-20.73%	-13.33%	-6.31%	33.92%	46.91%	-5.66%	17.59%

Correlation

The correlation between MNS.TO and NRJL.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2016	0.16

The correlation between MNS.TO and NRJL.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MNS.TO vs. NRJL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNS.TO

MNS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 33
MNS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
MNS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
MNS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 42
MNS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
MNS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 26

NRJL.L

NRJL.L Risk / Return Rank: 96
NRJL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
NRJL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
NRJL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 95
NRJL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
NRJL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNS.TO vs. NRJL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves (MNS.TO) and Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MNS.TO	NRJL.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	3.53	-2.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.53	4.17	-2.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.56	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.39	7.89	-6.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.21	25.63	-22.42

MNS.TO vs. NRJL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the NRJL.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNS.TO and NRJL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MNS.TO vs. NRJL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNS.TO drawdown since its inception was -47.17%, smaller than the maximum NRJL.L drawdown of -55.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNS.TO and NRJL.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	MNS.TO	NRJL.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.17%	-55.22%	+8.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.17%	-10.00%	-37.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-47.17%	-34.83%	-12.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.17%	-50.34%	+3.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-51.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-42.80%	-3.05%	-39.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.78%	-25.13%	+7.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.35%	3.08%	+17.27%

Volatility

MNS.TO vs. NRJL.L - Volatility Comparison

Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves (MNS.TO) has a higher volatility of 14.74% compared to Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L) at 10.07%. This indicates that MNS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NRJL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MNS.TO	NRJL.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.74%	10.07%	+4.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	52.69%	18.95%	+33.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	55.97%	22.33%	+33.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.55%	24.44%	+10.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.23%	24.16%	+7.07%

MNS.TO vs. NRJL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNS.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than NRJL.L's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

MNS.TO vs. NRJL.L - Dividend Comparison

MNS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NRJL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MNS.TO Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NRJL.L Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist	0.30%	0.42%	0.73%	0.77%	0.24%	0.32%	0.70%	1.02%	0.59%	0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MNS.TO and NRJL.L in my portfolio?

MNS.TO and NRJL.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MNS.TO or NRJL.L?

On fees, MNS.TO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MNS.TO or NRJL.L?

MNS.TO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for NRJL.L.

What is the main difference between MNS.TO and NRJL.L?

MNS.TO is categorized as Silver, while NRJL.L is Energy Equities. MNS.TO tracks N/A (Physical Bullion), while NRJL.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Royal Canadian Mint and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for MNS.TO and 0.60% for NRJL.L.