PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNRMX vs. FZALX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MNRMX vs. FZALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manor Investment Funds Manor Fund (MNRMX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNRMX achieves a 19.81% return, which is significantly higher than FZALX's 9.32% return. Over the past 10 years, MNRMX has underperformed FZALX with an annualized return of 12.37%, while FZALX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.07% annualized return.


MNRMX

1D
1.02%
1M
6.95%
YTD
19.81%
6M
18.03%
1Y
40.00%
3Y*
22.11%
5Y*
12.63%
10Y*
12.37%

FZALX

1D
-0.76%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
9.32%
6M
8.79%
1Y
28.19%
3Y*
25.22%
5Y*
16.52%
10Y*
17.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNRMX vs. FZALX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MNRMX
Manor Investment Funds Manor Fund
19.81%20.62%12.32%13.77%-10.73%29.52%5.94%31.64%-19.36%21.55%
FZALX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z
9.32%27.07%26.13%26.63%-8.89%26.44%13.06%31.25%-7.31%18.01%

Correlation

The correlation between MNRMX and FZALX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2013

0.90

The correlation between MNRMX and FZALX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNRMX vs. FZALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNRMX
MNRMX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
MNRMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNRMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNRMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
MNRMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNRMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

FZALX
FZALX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FZALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZALX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FZALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZALX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNRMX vs. FZALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manor Investment Funds Manor Fund (MNRMX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MNRMXFZALXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.42

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.71

3.25

+2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.74

14.45

+9.28

MNRMX vs. FZALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNRMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is comparable to the FZALX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNRMX and FZALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MNRMX vs. FZALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNRMX drawdown since its inception was -78.38%, which is greater than FZALX's maximum drawdown of -35.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNRMX and FZALX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNRMXFZALXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.38%

-35.23%

-43.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.20%

-8.99%

+1.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.38%

-18.49%

-59.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.38%

-23.25%

-55.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.38%

-35.23%

-43.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.66%

-1.42%

-61.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.65%

-3.77%

-8.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

2.02%

-0.29%

Volatility

MNRMX vs. FZALX - Volatility Comparison

Manor Investment Funds Manor Fund (MNRMX) has a higher volatility of 5.16% compared to Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z (FZALX) at 4.35%. This indicates that MNRMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FZALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNRMXFZALXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.16%

4.35%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.13%

9.70%

+2.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.07%

12.56%

+2.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

127.24%

16.76%

+110.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

91.15%

18.17%

+72.98%

MNRMX vs. FZALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNRMX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FZALX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

MNRMX vs. FZALX - Dividend Comparison

MNRMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.93%, more than FZALX's 3.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FZALX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class Z
3.69%4.04%2.83%2.17%4.51%4.92%8.14%13.19%21.94%16.56%2.12%4.33%
MNRMX
Manor Investment Funds Manor Fund
6.93%8.30%0.00%1.00%4.66%3.46%1.77%1.14%4.92%1.03%10.51%5.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


MNRMX and FZALX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MNRMX has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to FZALX (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNRMX dropped -78.38% vs FZALX's -35.23%.

MNRMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNRMX and FZALX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer