PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNNAX vs. BKTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MNNAX vs. BKTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund (MNNAX) and iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K (BKTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNNAX achieves a 15.12% return, which is significantly higher than BKTSX's 12.04% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MNNAX having a 14.55% annualized return and BKTSX not far ahead at 14.68%.


MNNAX

1D
0.96%
1M
1.27%
6M
12.11%
YTD
15.12%
1Y
26.17%
3Y*
22.90%
5Y*
14.95%
10Y*
14.55%
ALL TIME*
10.80%

BKTSX

1D
1.53%
1M
1.30%
6M
10.54%
YTD
12.04%
1Y
21.57%
3Y*
20.37%
5Y*
12.19%
10Y*
14.68%
ALL TIME*
14.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MNNAX vs. BKTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MNNAX
Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund
15.12%21.78%25.59%24.59%-19.03%35.03%11.18%28.33%-14.68%28.41%
BKTSX
iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K
12.04%17.15%23.83%26.02%-19.05%25.56%20.82%31.12%-5.37%21.02%

Correlation

The correlation between MNNAX and BKTSX is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.95

The correlation between MNNAX and BKTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNNAX vs. BKTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MNNAX
MNNAX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
MNNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
MNNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

BKTSX
BKTSX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
BKTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
BKTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MNNAX vs. BKTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund (MNNAX) and iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K (BKTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MNNAXBKTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.32

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

2.66

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.32

11.48

+1.84

MNNAX vs. BKTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNNAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the BKTSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNNAX and BKTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MNNAX vs. BKTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNNAX drawdown since its inception was -92.93%, which is greater than BKTSX's maximum drawdown of -34.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNNAX and BKTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNNAXBKTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.93%

-34.97%

-57.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.72%

-8.87%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

-19.29%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.29%

-24.98%

-5.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.01%

-34.97%

-3.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

0.00%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.46%

-4.48%

-45.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

2.05%

+0.09%

Volatility

MNNAX vs. BKTSX - Volatility Comparison

Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund (MNNAX) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K (BKTSX) at 3.77%. This indicates that MNNAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNNAXBKTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.02%

3.77%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.78%

10.29%

+1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.94%

13.05%

+1.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.09%

17.48%

+2.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.31%

18.42%

+1.89%

MNNAX vs. BKTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNNAX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than BKTSX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

MNNAX vs. BKTSX - Dividend Comparison

MNNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.49%, more than BKTSX's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKTSX
iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K
1.06%1.14%1.27%1.46%1.64%1.58%1.51%2.15%2.49%2.17%1.54%0.00%
MNNAX
Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund
12.49%14.38%8.72%4.65%15.37%10.88%0.07%2.76%19.25%5.28%0.00%21.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, MNNAX and BKTSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MNNAX has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to BKTSX (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNNAX dropped -92.93% vs BKTSX's -34.97%.

MNNAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNNAX and BKTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer