PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNDO vs. FTLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MNDO vs. FTLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO) and First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNDO achieves a -16.57% return, which is significantly lower than FTLS's 6.03% return. Over the past 10 years, MNDO has underperformed FTLS with an annualized return of 2.19%, while FTLS has yielded a comparatively higher 9.59% annualized return.


MNDO

1D
-5.94%
1M
-11.17%
6M
-16.57%
YTD
-16.57%
1Y
-31.96%
3Y*
-15.00%
5Y*
-15.08%
10Y*
2.19%
ALL TIME*
1.59%

FTLS

1D
-0.31%
1M
1.47%
6M
4.95%
YTD
6.03%
1Y
14.40%
3Y*
13.13%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*
9.59%
ALL TIME*
9.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.26M$8.04M$8.94M
$48.43K$57.56K$52.63K

MNDO vs. FTLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd
-16.57%-34.77%12.86%4.21%-26.48%30.73%21.80%18.54%-7.49%26.62%
FTLS
First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF
6.03%9.09%18.80%16.94%-5.56%19.65%2.56%16.16%-4.81%14.41%

Correlation

The correlation between MNDO and FTLS is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2014

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNDO vs. FTLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MNDO
MNDO Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
MNDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNDO Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
MNDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNDO Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

FTLS
FTLS Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FTLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTLS Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FTLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTLS Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MNDO vs. FTLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO) and First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MNDOFTLSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.28

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.85

3.55

-4.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.46

10.80

-12.25

MNDO vs. FTLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNDO Sharpe Ratio is -0.79, which is lower than the FTLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNDO and FTLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MNDO vs. FTLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNDO drawdown since its inception was -94.28%, which is greater than FTLS's maximum drawdown of -20.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNDO and FTLS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNDOFTLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.28%

-20.54%

-73.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.58%

-3.79%

-33.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.63%

-11.69%

-42.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.57%

-11.69%

-49.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.04%

-20.54%

-43.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.80%

-0.42%

-60.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.78%

-2.67%

-44.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.81%

1.24%

+20.57%

Volatility

MNDO vs. FTLS - Volatility Comparison

MIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO) has a higher volatility of 17.36% compared to First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS) at 2.15%. This indicates that MNDO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNDOFTLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.36%

2.15%

+15.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.84%

5.86%

+24.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.50%

8.54%

+31.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.96%

10.53%

+18.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.27%

11.23%

+16.04%

Dividends

MNDO vs. FTLS - Dividend Comparison

MNDO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTLS
First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF
0.88%1.07%1.50%1.49%0.81%0.01%0.44%0.83%0.87%0.43%1.04%0.49%
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd
0.00%19.13%12.15%12.24%12.38%8.37%9.27%10.79%13.16%11.55%10.98%11.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


MNDO and FTLS have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MNDO has higher volatility (17.36%) compared to FTLS (2.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNDO dropped -94.28% vs FTLS's -20.54%.

FTLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNDO and FTLS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer