MNBD vs. ZMUN

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

MNBD (ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF) and ZMUN (F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. MNBD is actively managed, while ZMUN is passively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MNBD charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for ZMUN.

Performance

MNBD vs. ZMUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF (MNBD) and F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MNBD having a 1.90% return and ZMUN slightly lower at 1.81%.

MNBD

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 1.38%
• YTD: 1.90%
• 6M: 2.02%
• 1Y: 6.18%
• 3Y*: 4.38%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZMUN

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 1.81%
• 6M: 1.88%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNBD vs. ZMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MNBD ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF	1.90%	1.45%
ZMUN F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF	1.81%	0.67%

Correlation

The correlation between MNBD and ZMUN is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025	0.12

Return for Risk

MNBD vs. ZMUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNBD

MNBD Risk / Return Rank: 77
MNBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
MNBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
MNBD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
MNBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
MNBD Martin Ratio Rank: 54

ZMUN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNBD vs. ZMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF (MNBD) and F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MNBD	ZMUN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.49	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.64	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.61	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.30	—	—

Drawdowns

MNBD vs. ZMUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNBD drawdown since its inception was -5.89%, which is greater than ZMUN's maximum drawdown of -0.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNBD and ZMUN.

Drawdown Indicators

	MNBD	ZMUN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.89%	-0.10%	-5.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.35%	0.00%	-0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.09%	-0.01%	-1.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.75%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MNBD	ZMUN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.73%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.99%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.50%	0.54%	+1.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.75%	0.54%	+3.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.75%	0.54%	+3.21%

MNBD vs. ZMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNBD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ZMUN's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

MNBD vs. ZMUN - Dividend Comparison

MNBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, more than ZMUN's 2.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
MNBD ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF	3.32%	3.32%	3.83%	3.44%	2.40%
ZMUN F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF	2.28%	0.70%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MNBD and ZMUN in my portfolio?

MNBD and ZMUN have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MNBD or ZMUN?

On fees, ZMUN is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MNBD or ZMUN?

ZMUN is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MNBD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MNBD or ZMUN?

MNBD has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 2.28% for ZMUN.

What is the main difference between MNBD and ZMUN?

They also come from different issuers: ALPS and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MNBD and 0.30% for ZMUN.