PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMUFX vs. BULIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMUFX vs. BULIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Utilities Fund (MMUFX) and American Century Utilities Fund (BULIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MMUFX having a 7.77% return and BULIX slightly higher at 7.92%. Over the past 10 years, MMUFX has outperformed BULIX with an annualized return of 9.02%, while BULIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.01% annualized return.


MMUFX

1D
0.60%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
7.77%
6M
7.60%
1Y
15.59%
3Y*
11.05%
5Y*
8.26%
10Y*
9.02%

BULIX

1D
0.87%
1M
0.22%
YTD
7.92%
6M
7.69%
1Y
14.60%
3Y*
16.23%
5Y*
9.36%
10Y*
7.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMUFX vs. BULIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMUFX
MFS Utilities Fund
7.77%14.32%11.38%-2.28%0.35%13.86%6.04%24.91%0.85%14.69%
BULIX
American Century Utilities Fund
7.92%16.76%24.32%-7.51%-4.37%13.77%-2.38%19.94%1.82%0.59%

Correlation

The correlation between MMUFX and BULIX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 1993

0.87

The correlation between MMUFX and BULIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMUFX vs. BULIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMUFX
MMUFX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
MMUFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMUFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMUFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MMUFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMUFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

BULIX
BULIX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
BULIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BULIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
BULIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
BULIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
BULIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMUFX vs. BULIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Utilities Fund (MMUFX) and American Century Utilities Fund (BULIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MMUFXBULIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.19

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

1.69

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.58

3.87

+0.71

MMUFX vs. BULIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMUFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the BULIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMUFX and BULIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MMUFX vs. BULIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMUFX drawdown since its inception was -56.03%, roughly equal to the maximum BULIX drawdown of -55.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMUFX and BULIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMUFXBULIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.03%

-55.21%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.75%

-8.93%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.72%

-16.54%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.64%

-24.56%

+2.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.82%

-33.86%

-1.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.52%

-4.26%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.75%

-10.02%

+1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.57%

3.90%

-0.33%

Volatility

MMUFX vs. BULIX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Utilities Fund (MMUFX) and American Century Utilities Fund (BULIX) have volatilities of 4.91% and 5.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMUFXBULIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.91%

5.07%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.58%

11.15%

+0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.36%

14.00%

+0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.82%

16.70%

-0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.61%

18.07%

-1.46%

MMUFX vs. BULIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMUFX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BULIX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMUFX vs. BULIX - Dividend Comparison

MMUFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, less than BULIX's 10.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BULIX
American Century Utilities Fund
10.49%11.60%2.36%2.65%7.78%7.50%7.55%2.97%6.91%7.70%6.99%5.87%
MMUFX
MFS Utilities Fund
3.55%3.83%3.72%5.82%8.68%5.61%5.80%6.85%4.29%2.67%3.72%9.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, MMUFX and BULIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BULIX has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to MMUFX (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMUFX dropped -56.03% vs BULIX's -55.21%.

MMUFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMUFX and BULIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer