MMTM vs. USOY

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MMTM (SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF) and USOY (Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MMTM is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index, while USOY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Defiance. MMTM is passively managed, while USOY is actively managed. Over the past year, MMTM returned 26.36% vs 55.52% for USOY. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. MMTM charges 0.12%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for USOY.

Performance

MMTM vs. USOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMTM achieves a 10.34% return, which is significantly lower than USOY's 59.86% return.

MMTM

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 3.02%
• YTD: 10.34%
• 6M: 10.72%
• 1Y: 26.36%
• 3Y*: 22.91%
• 5Y*: 13.95%
• 10Y*: 15.13%

USOY

• 1D: 1.63%
• 1M: -1.93%
• YTD: 59.86%
• 6M: 58.33%
• 1Y: 55.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMTM vs. USOY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MMTM SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF	10.34%	13.26%	14.85%
USOY Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF	59.86%	-7.93%	7.27%

Correlation

The correlation between MMTM and USOY is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2024	-0.06

The correlation between MMTM and USOY shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to -0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MMTM vs. USOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMTM

MMTM Risk / Return Rank: 56
MMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
MMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
MMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 54
MMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
MMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 66

USOY

USOY Risk / Return Rank: 56
USOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
USOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
USOY Omega Ratio Rank: 54
USOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
USOY Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMTM vs. USOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MMTM	USOY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	1.83	+0.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.59	2.25	+0.34
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.34	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.72	4.10	-1.38
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.36	7.91	+4.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MMTM vs. USOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMTM Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the USOY Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMTM and USOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MMTM	USOY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.87	1.83	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	0.96	-0.10

Drawdowns

MMTM vs. USOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMTM drawdown since its inception was -33.85%, which is greater than USOY's maximum drawdown of -17.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMTM and USOY.

Drawdown Indicators

	MMTM	USOY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.85%	-17.46%	-16.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.89%	-14.29%	+4.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.08%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.41%	-6.47%	+6.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.20%	-6.47%	+2.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.18%	7.42%	-5.24%

Volatility

MMTM vs. USOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) is 2.10%, while Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY) has a volatility of 11.94%. This indicates that MMTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MMTM	USOY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.10%	11.94%	-9.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.69%	27.16%	-16.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.14%	30.46%	-16.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.20%	26.14%	-7.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.65%	26.14%	-7.49%

MMTM vs. USOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMTM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than USOY's 1.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

MMTM vs. USOY - Dividend Comparison

MMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than USOY's 54.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MMTM SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF	0.78%	0.86%	0.83%	1.16%	1.67%	0.95%	1.14%	1.55%	1.64%	1.52%	1.98%	1.68%
USOY Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF	54.95%	104.32%	48.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MMTM and USOY in my portfolio?

MMTM and USOY have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MMTM or USOY?

USOY has higher volatility (11.94%) compared to MMTM (2.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMTM dropped -33.85% vs USOY's -17.46%.

Which ETF is better, MMTM or USOY?

On 1-year performance, USOY leads with 55.52% vs 26.36% for MMTM. On fees, MMTM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, MMTM has been the lower-risk option at 2.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MMTM or USOY?

Over the 1-year period, USOY has performed better with a 55.52% return vs 26.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MMTM or USOY?

MMTM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 1.22% for USOY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MMTM or USOY?

USOY has the higher dividend yield at 54.95%, compared with 0.78% for MMTM.

What is the main difference between MMTM and USOY?

MMTM is categorized as Momentum, while USOY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for MMTM and 1.22% for USOY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.