PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMTM vs. CPIEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMTM vs. CPIEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) and Counterpoint Tactical Equity Fund (CPIEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMTM achieves a 9.16% return, which is significantly lower than CPIEX's 11.41% return. Over the past 10 years, MMTM has outperformed CPIEX with an annualized return of 15.00%, while CPIEX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.95% annualized return.


MMTM

1D
-1.07%
1M
2.46%
YTD
9.16%
6M
9.58%
1Y
24.27%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.50%
10Y*
15.00%

CPIEX

1D
0.67%
1M
6.12%
YTD
11.41%
6M
12.50%
1Y
16.81%
3Y*
22.25%
5Y*
23.61%
10Y*
8.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMTM vs. CPIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMTM
SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF
9.16%13.26%29.94%22.49%-16.12%26.33%19.27%29.98%-4.62%24.41%
CPIEX
Counterpoint Tactical Equity Fund
11.41%10.21%37.75%6.18%12.15%54.08%-29.20%-7.69%-3.17%14.15%

Correlation

The correlation between MMTM and CPIEX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.42

Over the past year, MMTM and CPIEX have become more correlated (0.75) than their long-term average of 0.42, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMTM vs. CPIEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMTM
MMTM Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
MMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
MMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

CPIEX
CPIEX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
CPIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
CPIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMTM vs. CPIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) and Counterpoint Tactical Equity Fund (CPIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MMTMCPIEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.26

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

2.36

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.15

8.02

+3.13

MMTM vs. CPIEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMTM Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the CPIEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMTM and CPIEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MMTMCPIEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

1.48

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

1.88

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.71

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.62

+0.23

Drawdowns

MMTM vs. CPIEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMTM drawdown since its inception was -33.85%, smaller than the maximum CPIEX drawdown of -48.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMTM and CPIEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMTMCPIEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.85%

-48.20%

+14.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.89%

-7.14%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.08%

-7.30%

-14.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.72%

-9.76%

-13.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.85%

-48.20%

+14.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

0.00%

-1.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.20%

-9.88%

+5.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

2.10%

+0.08%

Volatility

MMTM vs. CPIEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) is 2.35%, while Counterpoint Tactical Equity Fund (CPIEX) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that MMTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CPIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMTMCPIEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.35%

3.33%

-0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.73%

7.11%

+3.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.19%

11.46%

+2.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.20%

12.60%

+5.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.65%

12.72%

+5.93%

MMTM vs. CPIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMTM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CPIEX's 1.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMTM vs. CPIEX - Dividend Comparison

MMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than CPIEX's 4.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CPIEX
Counterpoint Tactical Equity Fund
4.99%5.56%2.16%2.44%3.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.40%5.93%0.00%0.00%
MMTM
SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF
0.78%0.86%0.83%1.16%1.67%0.95%1.14%1.55%1.64%1.52%1.98%1.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


MMTM and CPIEX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CPIEX has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to MMTM (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMTM dropped -33.85% vs CPIEX's -48.20%.

MMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMTM and CPIEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer