MMT vs. RA

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

MMT (MFS Multimarket Income Trust) and RA (Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc.) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, MMT returned 1.89%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for RA. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MMT charges 0.03%/yr vs 2.76%/yr for RA.

Performance

MMT vs. RA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Multimarket Income Trust (MMT) and Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMT achieves a -0.72% return, which is significantly lower than RA's 3.60% return.

MMT

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: -0.83%
• YTD: -0.72%
• 6M: -0.93%
• 1Y: 4.54%
• 3Y*: 8.76%
• 5Y*: 1.89%
• 10Y*: 5.74%

RA

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.07%
• YTD: 3.60%
• 6M: 3.84%
• 1Y: 8.77%
• 3Y*: 2.86%
• 5Y*: 0.65%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMT vs. RA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MMT MFS Multimarket Income Trust	-0.72%	8.10%	12.40%	10.14%	-22.96%	13.11%	8.88%	30.32%	-7.70%	9.29%
RA Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc.	3.60%	8.32%	15.87%	-9.02%	-13.47%	32.35%	-4.17%	24.89%	-9.15%	15.99%

Correlation

The correlation between MMT and RA is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2016	0.33

Return for Risk

MMT vs. RA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMT

MMT Risk / Return Rank: 8
MMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
MMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
MMT Omega Ratio Rank: 7
MMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
MMT Martin Ratio Rank: 9

RA

RA Risk / Return Rank: 18
RA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
RA Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
RA Omega Ratio Rank: 20
RA Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
RA Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMT vs. RA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Multimarket Income Trust (MMT) and Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MMT	RA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.50	1.04	-0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.80	1.55	-0.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.20	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.84	1.31	-0.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.09	3.55	-1.46

MMT vs. RA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMT Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the RA Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMT and RA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MMT vs. RA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMT drawdown since its inception was -35.70%, smaller than the maximum RA drawdown of -50.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMT and RA.

Drawdown Indicators

	MMT	RA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.70%	-50.66%	+14.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.43%	-6.73%	+1.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.23%	-28.42%	+20.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.29%	-30.83%	-1.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.31%	-2.98%	-1.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.24%	-8.06%	+2.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.18%	2.48%	-0.30%

Volatility

MMT vs. RA - Volatility Comparison

MFS Multimarket Income Trust (MMT) has a higher volatility of 2.70% compared to Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA) at 1.74%. This indicates that MMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MMT	RA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.70%	1.74%	+0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.03%	6.64%	+0.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.03%	8.51%	+0.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.63%	17.57%	-5.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.31%	20.59%	-6.28%

MMT vs. RA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than RA's 2.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

MMT vs. RA - Dividend Comparison

MMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.10%, less than RA's 11.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MMT MFS Multimarket Income Trust	9.10%	8.65%	8.65%	8.65%	9.38%	7.86%	8.07%	8.16%	9.86%	8.83%	8.71%	9.05%
RA Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc.	11.14%	10.93%	10.63%	16.74%	14.79%	11.31%	13.39%	11.19%	12.52%	10.22%	0.89%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MMT and RA in my portfolio?

MMT and RA have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MMT or RA?

MMT has higher volatility (2.70%) compared to RA (1.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMT dropped -35.70% vs RA's -50.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.