MMT vs. RA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Multimarket Income Trust (MMT) and Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA).

MMT is managed by MFS Investment Management. It was launched on Mar 12, 1987. RA is managed by Brookfield.

Performance

MMT vs. RA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Multimarket Income Trust (MMT) and Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MMT vs. RA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MMT MFS Multimarket Income Trust	1.53%	8.10%	12.40%	10.14%	-22.96%	13.11%	8.88%	30.32%	-7.70%	9.29%
RA Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc.	1.98%	8.32%	15.87%	-9.02%	-13.47%	32.35%	-4.17%	24.89%	-9.15%	15.99%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMT achieves a 1.53% return, which is significantly lower than RA's 1.98% return.

MMT

• 1D: 1.76%
• 1M: -1.18%
• YTD: 1.53%
• 6M: 0.92%
• 1Y: 8.31%
• 3Y*: 9.72%
• 5Y*: 1.81%
• 10Y*: 6.50%

RA

• 1D: 2.39%
• 1M: -3.58%
• YTD: 1.98%
• 6M: 1.61%
• 1Y: 8.87%
• 3Y*: 3.37%
• 5Y*: 2.15%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMT vs. RA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than RA's 2.76% expense ratio.

RA

Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc.

MMT

MFS Multimarket Income Trust

Return for Risk

MMT vs. RA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMT

MMT Risk / Return Rank: 42
MMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
MMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
MMT Omega Ratio Rank: 37
MMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
MMT Martin Ratio Rank: 41

RA

RA Risk / Return Rank: 36
RA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
RA Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
RA Omega Ratio Rank: 37
RA Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
RA Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMT vs. RA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Multimarket Income Trust (MMT) and Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MMT	RA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	0.78	+0.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.27	1.09	+0.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.18	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.27	1.14	+0.13
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.35	4.08	+0.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MMT vs. RA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMT Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is comparable to the RA Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMT and RA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MMT	RA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92	0.78	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16	0.12	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.28	+0.13

Correlation

The correlation between MMT and RA is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MMT vs. RA - Dividend Comparison

MMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.71%, less than RA's 11.01% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MMT MFS Multimarket Income Trust	8.71%	8.65%	8.65%	8.65%	9.38%	7.86%	8.07%	8.16%	9.86%	8.83%	8.71%	9.05%
RA Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc.	11.01%	10.93%	10.63%	16.74%	14.79%	11.31%	13.39%	11.19%	12.52%	10.22%	0.89%	0.00%

Drawdowns

MMT vs. RA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMT drawdown since its inception was -35.70%, smaller than the maximum RA drawdown of -50.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMT and RA.

Drawdown Indicators

	MMT	RA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.70%	-50.66%	+14.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.74%	-7.58%	+0.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.29%	-30.83%	-1.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.14%	-4.50%	+2.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.26%	-8.18%	+2.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.96%	2.12%	-0.16%

Volatility

MMT vs. RA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Multimarket Income Trust (MMT) is 2.92%, while Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA) has a volatility of 5.16%. This indicates that MMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MMT	RA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.92%	5.16%	-2.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.79%	6.74%	-0.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.05%	11.38%	-2.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.58%	17.91%	-6.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.24%	20.82%	-6.58%