PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMSIX vs. MIIAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMSIX vs. MIIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Praxis Small Cap Index Fund (MMSIX) and Praxis Impact Bond Fund (MIIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMSIX achieves a 16.11% return, which is significantly higher than MIIAX's 0.43% return. Over the past 10 years, MMSIX has outperformed MIIAX with an annualized return of 9.99%, while MIIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.29% annualized return.


MMSIX

1D
1.49%
1M
3.18%
YTD
16.11%
6M
13.46%
1Y
28.58%
3Y*
14.19%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
9.99%

MIIAX

1D
0.21%
1M
0.82%
YTD
0.43%
6M
0.52%
1Y
4.51%
3Y*
3.76%
5Y*
-0.27%
10Y*
1.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMSIX vs. MIIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMSIX
Praxis Small Cap Index Fund
16.11%6.67%8.48%16.66%-19.61%34.07%11.05%24.44%-7.90%11.30%
MIIAX
Praxis Impact Bond Fund
0.43%6.82%1.17%5.32%-13.09%-2.22%7.45%7.75%-0.36%3.11%

Correlation

The correlation between MMSIX and MIIAX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2007

-0.16

The correlation between MMSIX and MIIAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMSIX vs. MIIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMSIX
MMSIX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
MMSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
MMSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

MIIAX
MIIAX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
MIIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
MIIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMSIX vs. MIIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Small Cap Index Fund (MMSIX) and Praxis Impact Bond Fund (MIIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MMSIXMIIAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.22

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

1.52

+1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.02

4.38

+6.64

MMSIX vs. MIIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the MIIAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMSIX and MIIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MMSIX vs. MIIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMSIX drawdown since its inception was -57.70%, which is greater than MIIAX's maximum drawdown of -18.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMSIX and MIIAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMSIXMIIAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.70%

-18.76%

-38.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.40%

-3.06%

-6.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.89%

-6.20%

-19.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.99%

-18.22%

-8.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.42%

-18.76%

-23.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-3.13%

+2.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.26%

-2.53%

-8.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

1.06%

+1.55%

Volatility

MMSIX vs. MIIAX - Volatility Comparison

Praxis Small Cap Index Fund (MMSIX) has a higher volatility of 5.25% compared to Praxis Impact Bond Fund (MIIAX) at 1.14%. This indicates that MMSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MIIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMSIXMIIAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.25%

1.14%

+4.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.23%

2.81%

+9.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.70%

3.76%

+12.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.41%

5.84%

+15.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.99%

4.73%

+18.26%

MMSIX vs. MIIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMSIX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than MIIAX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMSIX vs. MIIAX - Dividend Comparison

MMSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.65%, more than MIIAX's 3.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MIIAX
Praxis Impact Bond Fund
3.38%3.28%3.12%2.35%2.02%1.50%2.42%2.15%2.27%2.19%2.35%2.55%
MMSIX
Praxis Small Cap Index Fund
7.65%8.89%1.14%1.30%1.08%15.39%1.19%4.58%6.37%23.15%5.35%15.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


MMSIX and MIIAX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MMSIX has higher volatility (5.25%) compared to MIIAX (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMSIX dropped -57.70% vs MIIAX's -18.76%.

MMSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMSIX and MIIAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer