MMSIX vs. MCONX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MMSIX (Praxis Small Cap Index Fund) and MCONX (Praxis Genesis Conservative Portfolio) are both mutual funds - MMSIX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Praxis Mutual Funds, while MCONX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Praxis Mutual Funds. Over the past 10 years, MMSIX returned 10.27%/yr vs 4.33%/yr for MCONX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MMSIX charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for MCONX.

Performance

MMSIX vs. MCONX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Praxis Small Cap Index Fund (MMSIX) and Praxis Genesis Conservative Portfolio (MCONX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMSIX achieves a 16.37% return, which is significantly higher than MCONX's 3.22% return. Over the past 10 years, MMSIX has outperformed MCONX with an annualized return of 10.27%, while MCONX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.33% annualized return.

MMSIX

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 3.41%
• YTD: 16.37%
• 6M: 14.37%
• 1Y: 27.65%
• 3Y*: 15.46%
• 5Y*: 6.58%
• 10Y*: 10.27%

MCONX

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.98%
• YTD: 3.22%
• 6M: 3.11%
• 1Y: 9.88%
• 3Y*: 7.76%
• 5Y*: 2.10%
• 10Y*: 4.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMSIX vs. MCONX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MMSIX Praxis Small Cap Index Fund	16.37%	6.67%	8.48%	16.66%	-19.61%	34.07%	11.05%	24.44%	-7.90%	11.30%
MCONX Praxis Genesis Conservative Portfolio	3.22%	10.15%	5.16%	9.51%	-14.59%	1.66%	10.28%	13.67%	-2.64%	8.36%

Correlation

The correlation between MMSIX and MCONX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2009	0.69

The correlation between MMSIX and MCONX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MMSIX vs. MCONX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMSIX

MMSIX Risk / Return Rank: 50
MMSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
MMSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
MMSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
MMSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
MMSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

MCONX

MCONX Risk / Return Rank: 49
MCONX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
MCONX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
MCONX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
MCONX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
MCONX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMSIX vs. MCONX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Small Cap Index Fund (MMSIX) and Praxis Genesis Conservative Portfolio (MCONX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MMSIX	MCONX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	1.93	-0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	2.80	-0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.37	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.09	2.31	+0.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.08	9.36	+1.72

MMSIX vs. MCONX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the MCONX Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMSIX and MCONX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MMSIX vs. MCONX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMSIX drawdown since its inception was -57.70%, which is greater than MCONX's maximum drawdown of -21.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMSIX and MCONX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MMSIX	MCONX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.70%	-21.51%	-36.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.40%	-4.45%	-4.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.89%	-7.12%	-18.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.99%	-21.51%	-5.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.42%	-21.51%	-20.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.24%	+0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.26%	-2.97%	-8.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.61%	1.10%	+1.51%

Volatility

MMSIX vs. MCONX - Volatility Comparison

Praxis Small Cap Index Fund (MMSIX) has a higher volatility of 4.87% compared to Praxis Genesis Conservative Portfolio (MCONX) at 2.11%. This indicates that MMSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCONX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MMSIX	MCONX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.87%	2.11%	+2.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.20%	4.40%	+7.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.73%	5.34%	+11.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.39%	6.91%	+14.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.99%	6.22%	+16.77%

MMSIX vs. MCONX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMSIX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than MCONX's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

MMSIX vs. MCONX - Dividend Comparison

MMSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.64%, more than MCONX's 4.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MCONX Praxis Genesis Conservative Portfolio	4.72%	4.76%	4.90%	1.85%	2.31%	1.66%	3.49%	2.61%	3.84%	3.06%	2.25%	2.56%
MMSIX Praxis Small Cap Index Fund	7.64%	8.89%	1.14%	1.30%	1.08%	15.39%	1.19%	4.58%	6.37%	23.15%	5.35%	15.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MMSIX and MCONX in my portfolio?

MMSIX and MCONX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MMSIX or MCONX?

MMSIX has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to MCONX (2.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMSIX dropped -57.70% vs MCONX's -21.51%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MCONX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.