MMSC vs. SCHA
MMSC (First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF) and SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. MMSC is actively managed, while SCHA is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MMSC returned 22.52%/yr vs 18.92%/yr for SCHA. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MMSC charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHA.
Performance
MMSC vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMSC achieves a 17.91% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 19.79% return.
MMSC
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 5.15%
- YTD
- 17.91%
- 6M
- 17.19%
- 1Y
- 42.14%
- 3Y*
- 22.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHA
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 4.77%
- YTD
- 19.79%
- 6M
- 19.32%
- 1Y
- 40.27%
- 3Y*
- 18.92%
- 5Y*
- 7.13%
- 10Y*
- 11.13%
MMSC vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMSC First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF | 17.91% | 15.45% | 22.19% | 18.76% | -30.98% | 1.01% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 19.79% | 11.60% | 11.16% | 18.46% | -19.81% | -0.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMSC and SCHA is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2021 | 0.93 |
The correlation between MMSC and SCHA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
MMSC vs. SCHA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MMSC
SCHA
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Industrials
MMSC
SCHA
Technology
MMSC
SCHA
Healthcare
MMSC
SCHA
Financial Services
MMSC
SCHA
Consumer Cyclical
MMSC
SCHA
Energy
MMSC
SCHA
Basic Materials
MMSC
SCHA
Consumer Defensive
MMSC
SCHA
Utilities
MMSC
SCHA
Communication Services
MMSC
SCHA
Real Estate
MMSC
SCHA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMSC vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank
MMSC
SCHA
MMSC vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF (MMSC) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MMSC | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.90 | 2.25 | -0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.56 | 3.16 | -0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.38 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 4.26 | -1.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.46 | 15.66 | -4.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MMSC | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 2.25 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.57 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
MMSC vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMSC drawdown since its inception was -40.82%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHA drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMSC and SCHA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMSC | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.82% | -42.41% | +1.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.10% | -9.50% | -4.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.76% | -27.29% | -2.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | -0.58% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.78% | -7.58% | -11.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.69% | 2.58% | +1.11% |
Volatility
MMSC vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF (MMSC) has a higher volatility of 6.69% compared to Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) at 5.08%. This indicates that MMSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMSC | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.69% | 5.08% | +1.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.11% | 12.83% | +4.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.35% | 18.01% | +4.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.46% | 21.93% | +2.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.46% | 22.71% | +1.75% |
MMSC vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMSC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
MMSC vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison
MMSC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMSC First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 1.00% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMSC and SCHA have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MMSC has higher volatility (6.69%) compared to SCHA (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMSC dropped -40.82% vs SCHA's -42.41%.
On 3-year performance, MMSC leads with 22.52% vs 18.92% for SCHA. On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHA has been the lower-risk option at 5.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MMSC has performed better with a 22.52% return vs 18.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MMSC.
SCHA has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.00% for MMSC.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MMSC and 0.04% for SCHA.
SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MMSC and SCHA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer