PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMSC vs. GRID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMSC vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF (MMSC) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMSC achieves a 18.57% return, which is significantly lower than GRID's 28.91% return.


MMSC

1D
1.00%
1M
5.61%
YTD
18.57%
6M
19.48%
1Y
45.03%
3Y*
22.75%
5Y*
10Y*

GRID

1D
-0.17%
1M
3.85%
YTD
28.91%
6M
29.60%
1Y
51.55%
3Y*
26.27%
5Y*
17.84%
10Y*
19.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMSC vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MMSC
First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF
18.57%15.45%22.19%18.76%-30.98%1.01%
GRID
First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index
28.91%29.65%15.18%21.57%-13.89%6.13%

Correlation

The correlation between MMSC and GRID is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2021

0.83

The correlation between MMSC and GRID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

MMSC vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MMSC
GRID

Industrials

27.4%
65.2%

Technology

23.4%
11.0%

Healthcare

22.2%

-

Financial Services

8.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.2%
3.5%

Energy

6.7%

-

Basic Materials

2.5%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

1.4%

-

Utilities

0.7%
20.4%

Communication Services

0.5%

-

Real Estate

0.2%

-

Industrials

MMSC
27.4%
GRID
65.2%

Technology

MMSC
23.4%
GRID
11.0%

Healthcare

MMSC
22.2%
GRID

-

Financial Services

MMSC
8.1%
GRID

-

Consumer Cyclical

MMSC
7.2%
GRID
3.5%

Energy

MMSC
6.7%
GRID

-

Basic Materials

MMSC
2.5%
GRID
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

MMSC
1.4%
GRID

-

Utilities

MMSC
0.7%
GRID
20.4%

Communication Services

MMSC
0.5%
GRID

-

Real Estate

MMSC
0.2%
GRID

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMSC vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMSC
MMSC Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
MMSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMSC Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
MMSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMSC Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMSC vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF (MMSC) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MMSCGRIDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.03

2.67

-0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.70

3.50

-0.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.45

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

4.42

-1.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.59

16.72

-4.13

MMSC vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMSC Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the GRID Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMSC and GRID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MMSCGRIDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

2.67

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.57

-0.27

Drawdowns

MMSC vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMSC drawdown since its inception was -40.82%, roughly equal to the maximum GRID drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMSC and GRID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMSCGRIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.82%

-40.56%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.10%

-11.73%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.76%

-20.77%

-8.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-1.33%

+1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.80%

-8.43%

-10.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.69%

3.09%

+0.60%

Volatility

MMSC vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF (MMSC) is 6.65%, while First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID) has a volatility of 7.95%. This indicates that MMSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMSCGRIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.65%

7.95%

-1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.22%

16.08%

+1.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.35%

19.39%

+2.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.47%

21.00%

+3.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.47%

22.81%

+1.66%

MMSC vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMSC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMSC vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

MMSC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GRID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRID
First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index
0.77%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%
MMSC
First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF
0.00%0.00%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MMSC and GRID have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRID has higher volatility (7.95%) compared to MMSC (6.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMSC dropped -40.82% vs GRID's -40.56%.

On 3-year performance, GRID leads with 26.27% vs 22.75% for MMSC. On fees, GRID is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, MMSC has been the lower-risk option at 6.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GRID has performed better with a 26.27% return vs 22.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GRID is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MMSC.

GRID has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.00% for MMSC.

MMSC is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MMSC and 0.70% for GRID.

GRID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMSC and GRID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer