PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMSC vs. FYC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMSC vs. FYC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF (MMSC) and First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMSC achieves a 17.91% return, which is significantly lower than FYC's 20.01% return.


MMSC

1D
-0.56%
1M
5.15%
YTD
17.91%
6M
17.19%
1Y
42.14%
3Y*
22.52%
5Y*
10Y*

FYC

1D
-0.91%
1M
3.23%
YTD
20.01%
6M
20.96%
1Y
53.40%
3Y*
26.12%
5Y*
10.47%
10Y*
14.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMSC vs. FYC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MMSC
First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF
17.91%15.45%22.19%18.76%-30.98%1.01%
FYC
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
20.01%24.24%23.99%14.52%-25.86%2.29%

Correlation

The correlation between MMSC and FYC is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2021

0.95

The correlation between MMSC and FYC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

MMSC vs. FYC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MMSC
FYC

Industrials

27.4%
13.4%

Technology

23.4%
13.7%

Healthcare

22.2%
27.9%

Financial Services

8.1%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.2%
9.9%

Energy

6.7%
3.4%

Basic Materials

2.5%
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

1.4%
3.8%

Utilities

0.7%
1.5%

Communication Services

0.5%
3.4%

Real Estate

0.2%
8.4%

Industrials

MMSC
27.4%
FYC
13.4%

Technology

MMSC
23.4%
FYC
13.7%

Healthcare

MMSC
22.2%
FYC
27.9%

Financial Services

MMSC
8.1%
FYC
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

MMSC
7.2%
FYC
9.9%

Energy

MMSC
6.7%
FYC
3.4%

Basic Materials

MMSC
2.5%
FYC
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

MMSC
1.4%
FYC
3.8%

Utilities

MMSC
0.7%
FYC
1.5%

Communication Services

MMSC
0.5%
FYC
3.4%

Real Estate

MMSC
0.2%
FYC
8.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMSC vs. FYC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMSC
MMSC Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
MMSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMSC Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MMSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMSC Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

FYC
FYC Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYC Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMSC vs. FYC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF (MMSC) and First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MMSCFYCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.41

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

5.12

-2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.46

18.64

-7.17

MMSC vs. FYC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the FYC Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMSC and FYC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MMSCFYCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

2.55

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.54

-0.24

Drawdowns

MMSC vs. FYC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMSC drawdown since its inception was -40.82%, smaller than the maximum FYC drawdown of -47.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMSC and FYC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMSCFYCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.82%

-47.85%

+7.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.10%

-10.48%

-3.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.76%

-27.79%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-1.83%

+1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.78%

-9.66%

-9.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.69%

2.87%

+0.82%

Volatility

MMSC vs. FYC - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF (MMSC) has a higher volatility of 6.69% compared to First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) at 5.53%. This indicates that MMSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMSCFYCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.69%

5.53%

+1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.11%

14.99%

+2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.35%

21.03%

+1.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.46%

23.62%

+0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.46%

24.57%

-0.11%

MMSC vs. FYC - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMSC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FYC's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMSC vs. FYC - Dividend Comparison

MMSC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYC
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
0.07%0.08%0.72%0.58%0.00%0.63%0.12%0.39%0.09%0.10%0.31%0.21%
MMSC
First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF
0.00%0.00%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, MMSC and FYC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MMSC has higher volatility (6.69%) compared to FYC (5.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMSC dropped -40.82% vs FYC's -47.85%.

On 3-year performance, FYC leads with 26.12% vs 22.52% for MMSC. On fees, FYC is cheaper at 0.71% per year. On volatility, FYC has been the lower-risk option at 5.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, FYC has performed better with a 26.12% return vs 22.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FYC is cheaper with a 0.71% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MMSC.

FYC has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.00% for MMSC.

Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MMSC and 0.71% for FYC.

FYC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMSC and FYC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer