MMS vs. MHK

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Maximus, Inc. (MMS) and Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK).

Performance

MMS vs. MHK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Maximus, Inc. (MMS) and Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MMS vs. MHK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MMS Maximus, Inc.	-25.41%	17.47%	-9.70%	16.01%	-6.39%	10.31%	-0.07%	15.90%	-8.53%	28.68%
MHK Mohawk Industries, Inc.	-9.92%	-8.25%	15.10%	1.25%	-43.89%	29.25%	3.35%	16.60%	-57.61%	38.17%

Fundamentals

Market Cap MMS : $3.54B MHK : $6.09B
EPS MMS : $6.59 MHK : $5.93
PE Ratio MMS : 9.73 MHK : 16.61
PEG Ratio MMS : 0.76 MHK : 0.03
PS Ratio MMS : 0.67 MHK : 0.57
PB Ratio MMS : 2.06 MHK : 0.73
Total Revenue (TTM) MMS : $5.37B MHK : $10.79B
Gross Profit (TTM) MMS : $1.28B MHK : $2.62B
EBITDA (TTM) MMS : $690.89M MHK : $1.17B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMS achieves a -25.41% return, which is significantly lower than MHK's -9.92% return. Over the past 10 years, MMS has outperformed MHK with an annualized return of 3.17%, while MHK has yielded a comparatively lower -6.48% annualized return.

MMS

• 1D: -1.43%
• 1M: -15.22%
• YTD: -25.41%
• 6M: -29.27%
• 1Y: -4.50%
• 3Y*: -5.18%
• 5Y*: -5.41%
• 10Y*: 3.17%

MHK

• 1D: 3.26%
• 1M: -21.40%
• YTD: -9.92%
• 6M: -23.63%
• 1Y: -13.77%
• 3Y*: -0.59%
• 5Y*: -13.06%
• 10Y*: -6.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MMS vs. MHK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMS

MMS Risk / Return Rank: 34
MMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
MMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
MMS Omega Ratio Rank: 31
MMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
MMS Martin Ratio Rank: 35

MHK

MHK Risk / Return Rank: 26
MHK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
MHK Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
MHK Omega Ratio Rank: 25
MHK Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
MHK Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMS vs. MHK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Maximus, Inc. (MMS) and Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MMS	MHK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.13	-0.36	+0.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.05	-0.29	+0.34
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	0.97	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.13	-0.42	+0.29
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.40	-0.93	+0.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MMS vs. MHK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMS Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is higher than the MHK Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMS and MHK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MMS	MHK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13	-0.36	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.20	-0.34	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.11	-0.16	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.20	+0.11

Correlation

The correlation between MMS and MHK is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MMS vs. MHK - Dividend Comparison

MMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, while MHK has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MMS Maximus, Inc.	1.92%	1.39%	1.61%	1.36%	1.53%	1.41%	1.53%	1.38%	0.59%	0.25%	0.32%	0.32%
MHK Mohawk Industries, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

MMS vs. MHK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMS drawdown since its inception was -61.45%, smaller than the maximum MHK drawdown of -83.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMS and MHK.

Drawdown Indicators

	MMS	MHK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.45%	-83.44%	+21.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.92%	-31.77%	-3.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.40%	-66.68%	+26.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.40%	-79.40%	+39.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.92%	-65.43%	+30.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.77%	-30.84%	+14.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.46%	14.46%	-3.00%

Volatility

MMS vs. MHK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Maximus, Inc. (MMS) is 8.78%, while Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK) has a volatility of 12.06%. This indicates that MMS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MHK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MMS	MHK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.78%	12.06%	-3.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.21%	25.40%	+1.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.75%	38.45%	-4.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.50%	38.97%	-11.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.67%	40.78%	-13.11%

Financials

MMS vs. MHK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Maximus, Inc. and Mohawk Industries, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MMS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Maximus, Inc. reported a gross profit of 318.67M and revenue of 1.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.7%.

MHK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mohawk Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 663.20M and revenue of 2.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.6%.

MMS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Maximus, Inc. reported an operating income of 146.21M and revenue of 1.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.9%.

MHK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mohawk Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 100.10M and revenue of 2.70B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.

MMS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Maximus, Inc. reported a net income of 93.94M and revenue of 1.35B, resulting in a net margin of 7.0%.

MHK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mohawk Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 42.00M and revenue of 2.70B, resulting in a net margin of 1.6%.