MMS vs. TRBCX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MMS (Maximus, Inc.) is a stock, while TRBCX (T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past 10 years, MMS returned 1.57%/yr vs 17.70%/yr for TRBCX. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MMS vs. TRBCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Maximus, Inc. (MMS) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMS achieves a -34.57% return, which is significantly lower than TRBCX's 0.19% return. Over the past 10 years, MMS has underperformed TRBCX with an annualized return of 1.57%, while TRBCX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.70% annualized return.

MMS

• 1D: 3.48%
• 1M: -8.58%
• YTD: -34.57%
• 6M: -35.14%
• 1Y: -17.03%
• 3Y*: -11.12%
• 5Y*: -8.03%
• 10Y*: 1.57%

TRBCX

• 1D: -1.60%
• 1M: -3.26%
• YTD: 0.19%
• 6M: -0.94%
• 1Y: 15.20%
• 3Y*: 25.86%
• 5Y*: 11.30%
• 10Y*: 17.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMS vs. TRBCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MMS Maximus, Inc.	-34.57%	17.47%	-9.70%	16.01%	-6.39%	10.31%	-0.07%	15.90%	-8.53%	28.68%
TRBCX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund	0.19%	18.78%	48.46%	49.42%	-38.57%	17.54%	34.73%	29.97%	2.00%	36.54%

Correlation

The correlation between MMS and TRBCX is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 1997	0.43

Over the past year, the correlation between MMS and TRBCX has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

MMS vs. TRBCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMS

MMS Risk / Return Rank: 23
MMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
MMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
MMS Omega Ratio Rank: 19
MMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
MMS Martin Ratio Rank: 26

TRBCX

TRBCX Risk / Return Rank: 12
TRBCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
TRBCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
TRBCX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
TRBCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
TRBCX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMS vs. TRBCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Maximus, Inc. (MMS) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MMS	TRBCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.53	0.95	-1.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.52	1.34	-1.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.17	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.38	0.98	-1.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.84	3.23	-4.07

MMS vs. TRBCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMS Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the TRBCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMS and TRBCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MMS vs. TRBCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMS drawdown since its inception was -61.45%, which is greater than TRBCX's maximum drawdown of -54.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMS and TRBCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MMS	TRBCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.45%	-54.56%	-6.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.83%	-17.01%	-27.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-44.83%	-23.08%	-21.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.83%	-43.63%	-1.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.83%	-43.63%	-1.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-42.91%	-5.67%	-37.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.93%	-11.29%	-5.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.33%	5.14%	+15.19%

Volatility

MMS vs. TRBCX - Volatility Comparison

Maximus, Inc. (MMS) has a higher volatility of 10.06% compared to T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX) at 6.46%. This indicates that MMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRBCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MMS	TRBCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.06%	6.46%	+3.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.32%	14.49%	+13.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.62%	17.62%	+15.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.92%	24.16%	+3.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.59%	22.87%	+4.72%

Dividends

MMS vs. TRBCX - Dividend Comparison

MMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than TRBCX's 5.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MMS Maximus, Inc.	2.25%	1.39%	1.61%	1.36%	1.53%	1.41%	1.53%	1.38%	0.59%	0.25%	0.32%	0.32%
TRBCX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund	5.24%	5.25%	18.16%	3.49%	5.87%	9.38%	1.19%	0.36%	2.44%	2.94%	0.67%	3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MMS and TRBCX in my portfolio?

MMS and TRBCX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MMS or TRBCX?

MMS has higher volatility (10.06%) compared to TRBCX (6.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMS dropped -61.45% vs TRBCX's -54.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TRBCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.