MMS vs. TRBCX
MMS (Maximus, Inc.) is a stock, while TRBCX (T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past 10 years, MMS returned 1.73%/yr vs 16.56%/yr for TRBCX. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MMS vs. TRBCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMS achieves a -27.21% return, which is significantly lower than TRBCX's -1.84% return. Over the past 10 years, MMS has underperformed TRBCX with an annualized return of 1.73%, while TRBCX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.56% annualized return.
MMS
- 1D
- 3.25%
- 1M
- 11.59%
- 6M
- -33.51%
- YTD
- -27.21%
- 1Y
- -13.19%
- 3Y*
- -6.41%
- 5Y*
- -4.83%
- 10Y*
- 1.73%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.02%
TRBCX
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -0.95%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- -1.84%
- 1Y
- 6.79%
- 3Y*
- 23.00%
- 5Y*
- 10.10%
- 10Y*
- 16.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.01%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $34.23M | $35.21M | $44.06M | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
MMS vs. TRBCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMS Maximus, Inc. | -27.21% | 17.47% | -9.70% | 16.01% | -6.39% | 10.31% | -0.07% | 15.90% | -8.53% | 28.68% |
TRBCX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund | -1.84% | 18.78% | 48.46% | 49.42% | -38.57% | 17.54% | 34.73% | 29.97% | 2.00% | 36.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMS and TRBCX is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 1997 | 0.43 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MMS and TRBCX has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMS vs. TRBCX — Risk / Return Rank
MMS
TRBCX
MMS vs. TRBCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Maximus, Inc. (MMS) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MMS | TRBCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.05 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.29 | 0.26 | -0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.54 | 0.78 | -1.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MMS vs. TRBCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMS drawdown since its inception was -61.45%, which is greater than TRBCX's maximum drawdown of -54.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMS and TRBCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMS | TRBCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.45% | -54.56% | -6.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.11% | -17.01% | -28.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.11% | -23.08% | -22.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.11% | -43.63% | -1.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.11% | -43.63% | -1.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.48% | -7.58% | -28.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.02% | -11.28% | -5.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.51% | 5.67% | +18.84% |
Volatility
MMS vs. TRBCX - Volatility Comparison
Maximus, Inc. (MMS) has a higher volatility of 9.13% compared to T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX) at 6.15%. This indicates that MMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRBCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMS | TRBCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.13% | 6.15% | +2.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.11% | 15.49% | +13.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.34% | 18.64% | +14.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.12% | 24.27% | +3.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.61% | 22.89% | +4.72% |
Dividends
MMS vs. TRBCX - Dividend Comparison
MMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than TRBCX's 5.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMS Maximus, Inc. | 2.03% | 1.39% | 1.61% | 1.36% | 1.53% | 1.41% | 1.53% | 1.38% | 0.59% | 0.25% | 0.32% | 0.32% |
TRBCX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund | 5.34% | 5.25% | 18.16% | 3.49% | 5.87% | 9.38% | 1.19% | 0.36% | 2.44% | 2.94% | 0.67% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMS and TRBCX have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MMS has higher volatility (9.13%) compared to TRBCX (6.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMS dropped -61.45% vs TRBCX's -54.56%.
TRBCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.24 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MMS and TRBCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer