MMNIX vs. HFGM
MMNIX (Miller Market Neutral Income Fund Class I) and HFGM (Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF) are both funds - MMNIX is a Equity Market Neutral fund actively managed by Miller, while HFGM is a Macro Trading fund actively managed by Unlimited. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MMNIX returned 9.63% vs 39.23% for HFGM. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. MMNIX charges 1.69%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for HFGM.
Performance
MMNIX vs. HFGM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMNIX achieves a 3.47% return, which is significantly lower than HFGM's 14.95% return.
MMNIX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 3.47%
- 6M
- 4.33%
- 1Y
- 9.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HFGM
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 14.95%
- 6M
- 14.19%
- 1Y
- 39.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MMNIX vs. HFGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MMNIX Miller Market Neutral Income Fund Class I | 3.47% | 7.15% |
HFGM Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF | 14.95% | 26.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMNIX and HFGM is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2025 | -0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMNIX vs. HFGM — Risk / Return Rank
MMNIX
HFGM
MMNIX vs. HFGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Miller Market Neutral Income Fund Class I (MMNIX) and Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF (HFGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MMNIX | HFGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +9.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.82 | 1.31 | +1.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 20.83 | 3.70 | +17.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 89.27 | 9.95 | +79.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MMNIX | HFGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.14 | 1.75 | +4.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 5.53 | 1.82 | +3.71 |
Drawdowns
MMNIX vs. HFGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMNIX drawdown since its inception was -0.49%, smaller than the maximum HFGM drawdown of -10.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMNIX and HFGM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMNIX | HFGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.49% | -10.66% | +10.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.46% | -10.66% | +10.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -5.28% | +5.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.06% | -2.68% | +2.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.11% | 3.95% | -3.84% |
Volatility
MMNIX vs. HFGM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Miller Market Neutral Income Fund Class I (MMNIX) is 0.42%, while Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF (HFGM) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that MMNIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HFGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMNIX | HFGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.42% | 4.40% | -3.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.12% | 17.41% | -16.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56% | 22.55% | -20.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.74% | 21.75% | -20.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.74% | 21.75% | -20.01% |
MMNIX vs. HFGM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMNIX has a 1.69% expense ratio, which is higher than HFGM's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
MMNIX vs. HFGM - Dividend Comparison
MMNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, less than HFGM's 9.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HFGM Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF | 9.77% | 11.23% | 0.00% |
MMNIX Miller Market Neutral Income Fund Class I | 4.75% | 5.03% | 4.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMNIX and HFGM have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HFGM has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to MMNIX (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMNIX dropped -0.49% vs HFGM's -10.66%.
MMNIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.14 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MMNIX and HFGM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer