MMMA vs. SUB
MMMA (NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF) and SUB (iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. MMMA is actively managed, while SUB is passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MMMA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for SUB.
Performance
MMMA vs. SUB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMMA achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly higher than SUB's 0.79% return.
MMMA
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 3.03%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SUB
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- 1Y
- 3.12%
- 3Y*
- 3.13%
- 5Y*
- 1.46%
- 10Y*
- 1.49%
MMMA vs. SUB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MMMA NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF | 3.03% | 0.33% |
SUB iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF | 0.79% | 0.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMMA and SUB is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMMA vs. SUB — Risk / Return Rank
MMMA
SUB
MMMA vs. SUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF (MMMA) and iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF (SUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MMMA | SUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.79 | 0.42 | +1.37 |
Drawdowns
MMMA vs. SUB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMMA drawdown since its inception was -2.79%, smaller than the maximum SUB drawdown of -9.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMMA and SUB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMMA | SUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.79% | -9.46% | +6.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -4.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -9.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -0.11% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.60% | -0.92% | +0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.28% | — |
Volatility
MMMA vs. SUB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMMA | SUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.28% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.79% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.15% | 1.00% | +3.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.15% | 1.64% | +2.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.15% | 2.59% | +1.56% |
MMMA vs. SUB - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMMA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SUB's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
MMMA vs. SUB - Dividend Comparison
MMMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than SUB's 2.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMMA NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF | 1.96% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SUB iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF | 2.53% | 2.42% | 2.10% | 1.73% | 0.86% | 0.72% | 1.23% | 1.58% | 1.32% | 0.95% | 0.75% | 0.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMMA and SUB have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SUB is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SUB is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MMMA.
SUB has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 1.96% for MMMA.
They also come from different issuers: NYLI and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for MMMA and 0.07% for SUB.
Find the right allocation for MMMA and SUB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer