PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMMA vs. IBMN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMMA vs. IBMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF (MMMA) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MMMA

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.50%
YTD
3.03%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBMN

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
1.18%
3Y*
2.38%
5Y*
0.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMMA vs. IBMN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMMA vs. IBMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMMA

IBMN
IBMN Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
IBMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBMN Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
IBMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBMN Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMMA vs. IBMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF (MMMA) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MMMA vs. IBMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MMMAIBMNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.79

0.58

+1.21

Drawdowns

MMMA vs. IBMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMMA drawdown since its inception was -2.79%, smaller than the maximum IBMN drawdown of -12.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMMA and IBMN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMMAIBMNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.79%

-12.40%

+9.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-0.05%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.60%

-1.81%

+1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.10%

Volatility

MMMA vs. IBMN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMMAIBMNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.15%

0.71%

+3.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.15%

1.79%

+2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.15%

3.89%

+0.26%

MMMA vs. IBMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMMA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IBMN's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMMA vs. IBMN - Dividend Comparison

MMMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, more than IBMN's 1.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IBMN
iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF
1.14%2.03%2.03%1.72%0.97%0.70%1.11%1.65%0.23%
MMMA
NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF
1.96%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, IBMN is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBMN is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MMMA.

MMMA has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 1.14% for IBMN.

They also come from different issuers: NYLI and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for MMMA and 0.18% for IBMN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMMA and IBMN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer