PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMMA vs. AUSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMMA vs. AUSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF (MMMA) and Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF (AUSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMMA achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly higher than AUSM's 1.02% return.


MMMA

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.50%
YTD
3.03%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AUSM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.23%
YTD
1.02%
6M
1.36%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMMA vs. AUSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MMMA and AUSM is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMMA vs. AUSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF (MMMA) and Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF (AUSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MMMA vs. AUSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MMMAAUSMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.79

4.02

-2.23

Drawdowns

MMMA vs. AUSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMMA drawdown since its inception was -2.79%, which is greater than AUSM's maximum drawdown of -0.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMMA and AUSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMMAAUSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.79%

-0.42%

-2.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

0.00%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.60%

-0.09%

-0.51%

Volatility

MMMA vs. AUSM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMMAAUSMDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.15%

0.73%

+3.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.15%

0.73%

+3.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.15%

0.73%

+3.42%

MMMA vs. AUSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMMA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than AUSM's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMMA vs. AUSM - Dividend Comparison

MMMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than AUSM's 2.39% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


MMMA and AUSM have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AUSM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AUSM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MMMA.

AUSM has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 1.96% for MMMA.

They also come from different issuers: NYLI and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for MMMA and 0.18% for AUSM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMMA and AUSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer