PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMM vs. BMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MMM vs. BMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 3M Company (MMM) and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMM achieves a -0.15% return, which is significantly lower than BMY's 8.27% return. Over the past 10 years, MMM has outperformed BMY with an annualized return of 4.58%, while BMY has yielded a comparatively lower 1.00% annualized return.


MMM

1D
0.26%
1M
8.18%
YTD
-0.15%
6M
-5.36%
1Y
11.41%
3Y*
26.46%
5Y*
2.22%
10Y*
4.58%

BMY

1D
0.40%
1M
1.31%
YTD
8.27%
6M
11.43%
1Y
18.34%
3Y*
0.45%
5Y*
0.73%
10Y*
1.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMM vs. BMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMM
3M Company
-0.15%26.36%46.13%-3.33%-29.63%4.85%2.77%-4.29%-16.90%34.90%
BMY
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
8.27%0.11%15.81%-26.14%18.98%2.88%0.41%27.74%-12.90%7.71%

Correlation

The correlation between MMM and BMY is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 1972

0.36

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MMM:

$84.35B

BMY:

$116.75B

EPS

MMM:

$5.17

BMY:

$3.57

PE Ratio

MMM:

30.65

BMY:

16.02

PS Ratio

MMM:

3.41

BMY:

2.40

PB Ratio

MMM:

25.85

BMY:

5.82

Total Revenue (TTM)

MMM:

$25.02B

BMY:

$48.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MMM:

$9.89B

BMY:

$33.33B

EBITDA (TTM)

MMM:

$5.28B

BMY:

$13.34B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMM vs. BMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMM
MMM Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
MMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMM Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMM Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

BMY
BMY Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMY Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
BMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMY Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMM vs. BMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3M Company (MMM) and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MMMBMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.14

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

1.53

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.35

3.32

-1.97

MMM vs. BMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMM Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the BMY Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMM and BMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MMM vs. BMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMM drawdown since its inception was -59.10%, smaller than the maximum BMY drawdown of -72.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMM and BMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMMBMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.10%

-72.03%

+12.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.77%

-12.05%

-6.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.87%

-36.85%

+13.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.34%

-47.67%

-5.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.10%

-47.67%

-11.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.45%

-17.79%

+9.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.10%

-22.38%

+6.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.48%

6.34%

+2.14%

Volatility

MMM vs. BMY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 3M Company (MMM) is 6.23%, while Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) has a volatility of 8.22%. This indicates that MMM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMMBMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.23%

8.22%

-1.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.26%

18.18%

+1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.96%

27.08%

-1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.30%

24.02%

+4.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.53%

25.29%

+1.24%

Dividends

MMM vs. BMY - Dividend Comparison

MMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than BMY's 4.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BMY
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
4.38%4.60%4.24%4.44%3.00%2.36%3.69%2.55%3.08%2.55%1.95%2.17%
MMM
3M Company
1.91%1.82%16.27%5.49%4.97%3.33%3.36%3.26%2.86%2.00%2.49%2.72%

Financials

MMM vs. BMY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between 3M Company and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
6.03B
11.49B
(MMM) Total Revenue
(BMY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MMM vs. BMY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between 3M Company and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
40.7%
70.2%
Portfolio components
MMM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, 3M Company reported a gross profit of 2.46B and revenue of 6.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.7%.

BMY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company reported a gross profit of 8.07B and revenue of 11.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.2%.

MMM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, 3M Company reported an operating income of 1.40B and revenue of 6.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.2%.

BMY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company reported an operating income of 3.27B and revenue of 11.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.5%.

MMM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, 3M Company reported a net income of 653.00M and revenue of 6.03B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.

BMY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company reported a net income of 2.68B and revenue of 11.49B, resulting in a net margin of 23.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MMM and BMY have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BMY has higher volatility (8.22%) compared to MMM (6.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMM dropped -59.10% vs BMY's -72.03%.

BMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMM and BMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer