MMLG vs. NFTY
MMLG (First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF) and NFTY (First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MMLG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while NFTY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index. MMLG is actively managed, while NFTY is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MMLG returned 8.34%/yr vs 4.62%/yr for NFTY. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MMLG charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for NFTY.
Performance
MMLG vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMLG achieves a 4.76% return, which is significantly higher than NFTY's -9.70% return.
MMLG
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 4.76%
- 6M
- 4.14%
- 1Y
- 16.13%
- 3Y*
- 21.41%
- 5Y*
- 8.34%
- 10Y*
- —
NFTY
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- YTD
- -9.70%
- 6M
- -7.99%
- 1Y
- -8.48%
- 3Y*
- 5.72%
- 5Y*
- 4.62%
- 10Y*
- 8.13%
MMLG vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMLG First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF | 4.76% | 17.28% | 25.96% | 45.21% | -39.18% | 13.23% | 20.61% |
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | -9.70% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 24.00% | -3.46% | 26.83% | 27.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMLG and NFTY is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2020 | 0.38 |
MMLG vs. NFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MMLG
NFTY
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
MMLG
NFTY
Financial Services
MMLG
NFTY
Consumer Cyclical
MMLG
NFTY
Industrials
MMLG
NFTY
Healthcare
MMLG
NFTY
Communication Services
MMLG
NFTY
Consumer Defensive
MMLG
NFTY
Basic Materials
MMLG
NFTY
Energy
MMLG
NFTY
Utilities
MMLG
NFTY
Real Estate
MMLG
-
NFTY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMLG vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank
MMLG
NFTY
MMLG vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF (MMLG) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MMLG | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.91 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.81 | -0.53 | +1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.34 | -1.39 | +3.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MMLG | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | -0.58 | +1.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.27 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.28 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
MMLG vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMLG drawdown since its inception was -45.97%, roughly equal to the maximum NFTY drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMLG and NFTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMLG | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.97% | -47.67% | +1.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.89% | -16.14% | -3.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.57% | -21.55% | -5.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.97% | -21.55% | -24.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.17% | -17.45% | +15.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.36% | -9.58% | -4.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.91% | 6.12% | +0.79% |
Volatility
MMLG vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF (MMLG) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) have volatilities of 4.37% and 4.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMLG | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 4.58% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.03% | 12.57% | +1.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.22% | 14.72% | +3.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.94% | 17.39% | +7.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.54% | 20.72% | +3.82% |
MMLG vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMLG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than NFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
MMLG vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison
MMLG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMLG First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | 1.96% | 1.24% | 1.61% | 0.13% | 5.89% | 1.53% | 0.61% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 4.10% | 3.28% | 4.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMLG and NFTY have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NFTY has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to MMLG (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMLG dropped -45.97% vs NFTY's -47.67%.
On 5-year performance, MMLG leads with 8.34% vs 4.62% for NFTY. On fees, NFTY is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, MMLG has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MMLG has performed better with a 8.34% return vs 4.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NFTY is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MMLG.
NFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.00% for MMLG.
MMLG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while NFTY is Asia Pacific Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for MMLG and 0.80% for NFTY.
MMLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MMLG and NFTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer