MMLG vs. FTXL
MMLG (First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF) and FTXL (First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MMLG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while FTXL is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. MMLG is actively managed, while FTXL is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MMLG returned 8.34%/yr vs 34.63%/yr for FTXL. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MMLG charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTXL.
Performance
MMLG vs. FTXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMLG achieves a 4.76% return, which is significantly lower than FTXL's 115.70% return.
MMLG
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 4.76%
- 6M
- 4.14%
- 1Y
- 16.13%
- 3Y*
- 21.41%
- 5Y*
- 8.34%
- 10Y*
- —
FTXL
- 1D
- 2.21%
- 1M
- 30.59%
- YTD
- 115.70%
- 6M
- 113.17%
- 1Y
- 225.15%
- 3Y*
- 61.52%
- 5Y*
- 34.63%
- 10Y*
- —
MMLG vs. FTXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMLG First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF | 4.76% | 17.28% | 25.96% | 45.21% | -39.18% | 13.23% | 20.61% |
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 115.70% | 48.94% | 7.59% | 54.41% | -33.88% | 36.04% | 29.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMLG and FTXL is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2020 | 0.74 |
The correlation between MMLG and FTXL shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MMLG vs. FTXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MMLG
FTXL
Technology
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
MMLG
FTXL
Financial Services
MMLG
FTXL
-
Consumer Cyclical
MMLG
FTXL
-
Industrials
MMLG
FTXL
Healthcare
MMLG
FTXL
-
Communication Services
MMLG
FTXL
-
Consumer Defensive
MMLG
FTXL
-
Basic Materials
MMLG
FTXL
-
Energy
MMLG
FTXL
-
Utilities
MMLG
FTXL
-
Real Estate
MMLG
-
FTXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMLG vs. FTXL — Risk / Return Rank
MMLG
FTXL
MMLG vs. FTXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF (MMLG) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MMLG | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.78 | -0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.81 | 15.62 | -14.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.34 | 58.28 | -55.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MMLG | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 6.33 | -5.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.97 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.94 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
MMLG vs. FTXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMLG drawdown since its inception was -45.97%, roughly equal to the maximum FTXL drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMLG and FTXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMLG | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.97% | -43.87% | -2.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.89% | -14.51% | -5.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.57% | -41.57% | +15.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.97% | -43.87% | -2.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.17% | 0.00% | -2.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.36% | -10.56% | -3.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.91% | 3.88% | +3.03% |
Volatility
MMLG vs. FTXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF (MMLG) is 4.37%, while First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) has a volatility of 14.28%. This indicates that MMLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMLG | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 14.28% | -9.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.03% | 28.98% | -14.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.22% | 35.94% | -17.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.94% | 36.02% | -11.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.54% | 34.25% | -9.71% |
MMLG vs. FTXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMLG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FTXL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
MMLG vs. FTXL - Dividend Comparison
MMLG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 0.12% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.89% | 0.25% | 0.48% | 0.92% | 0.71% | 0.47% | 0.12% |
MMLG First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMLG and FTXL have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTXL has higher volatility (14.28%) compared to MMLG (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMLG dropped -45.97% vs FTXL's -43.87%.
On 5-year performance, FTXL leads with 34.63% vs 8.34% for MMLG. On fees, FTXL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, MMLG has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FTXL has performed better with a 34.63% return vs 8.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTXL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MMLG.
FTXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.00% for MMLG.
MMLG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FTXL is Semiconductors. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for MMLG and 0.60% for FTXL.
FTXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.33 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MMLG and FTXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer