MMLG vs. DBO
MMLG (First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - MMLG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. MMLG is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MMLG returned 8.34%/yr vs 15.98%/yr for DBO. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MMLG charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
MMLG vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMLG achieves a 4.76% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return.
MMLG
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 4.76%
- 6M
- 4.14%
- 1Y
- 16.13%
- 3Y*
- 21.41%
- 5Y*
- 8.34%
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- 84.75%
- 6M
- 81.10%
- 1Y
- 80.26%
- 3Y*
- 21.86%
- 5Y*
- 15.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
MMLG vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMLG First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF | 4.76% | 17.28% | 25.96% | 45.21% | -39.18% | 13.23% | 20.61% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 84.75% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -4.44% | 13.04% | 60.74% | 13.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMLG and DBO is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2020 | 0.07 |
The correlation between MMLG and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MMLG vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MMLG
DBO
Technology
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
MMLG
DBO
-
Financial Services
MMLG
DBO
Consumer Cyclical
MMLG
DBO
-
Industrials
MMLG
DBO
-
Healthcare
MMLG
DBO
-
Communication Services
MMLG
DBO
-
Consumer Defensive
MMLG
DBO
-
Basic Materials
MMLG
DBO
-
Energy
MMLG
DBO
-
Utilities
MMLG
DBO
-
Real Estate
MMLG
-
DBO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMLG vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
MMLG
DBO
MMLG vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF (MMLG) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MMLG | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.38 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.81 | 4.44 | -3.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.34 | 9.02 | -6.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MMLG | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 2.34 | -1.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.50 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.02 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
MMLG vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMLG drawdown since its inception was -45.97%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMLG and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMLG | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.97% | -90.18% | +44.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.89% | -18.19% | -1.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.57% | -28.20% | +1.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.97% | -37.68% | -8.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.17% | -51.38% | +49.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.36% | -62.25% | +47.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.91% | 8.92% | -2.01% |
Volatility
MMLG vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF (MMLG) is 4.37%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that MMLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMLG | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 12.61% | -8.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.03% | 28.20% | -14.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.22% | 34.46% | -16.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.94% | 32.29% | -7.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.54% | 31.78% | -7.24% |
MMLG vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMLG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
MMLG vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
MMLG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.90% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
MMLG First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMLG and DBO have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to MMLG (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMLG dropped -45.97% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 5-year performance, DBO leads with 15.98% vs 8.34% for MMLG. On fees, DBO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, MMLG has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DBO has performed better with a 15.98% return vs 8.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MMLG.
DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 0.00% for MMLG.
MMLG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for MMLG and 0.78% for DBO.
DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MMLG and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer