MMKT vs. ASMG
MMKT (Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF) and ASMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MMKT is a Money Market fund actively managed by Texas Capital, while ASMG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MMKT returned 3.81% vs 308.54% for ASMG. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. MMKT charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ASMG.
Performance
MMKT vs. ASMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMKT achieves a 1.44% return, which is significantly lower than ASMG's 127.56% return.
MMKT
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 3.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASMG
- 1D
- 2.43%
- 1M
- 49.91%
- YTD
- 127.56%
- 6M
- 96.41%
- 1Y
- 308.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MMKT vs. ASMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MMKT Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF | 1.44% | 3.97% |
ASMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF | 127.56% | 63.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMKT and ASMG is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMKT vs. ASMG — Risk / Return Rank
MMKT
ASMG
MMKT vs. ASMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MMKT | ASMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +12.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +59.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 15.14 | 1.42 | +13.72 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 153.44 | 8.99 | +144.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 910.67 | 22.40 | +888.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MMKT | ASMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.49 | 3.83 | +12.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 17.60 | 1.89 | +15.71 |
Drawdowns
MMKT vs. ASMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMKT drawdown since its inception was -0.04%, smaller than the maximum ASMG drawdown of -43.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMKT and ASMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMKT | ASMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.04% | -43.95% | +43.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.02% | -34.56% | +34.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -13.28% | +13.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 13.85% | -13.85% |
Volatility
MMKT vs. ASMG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) is 0.05%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG) has a volatility of 29.17%. This indicates that MMKT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMKT | ASMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.05% | 29.17% | -29.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.13% | 64.23% | -64.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23% | 81.15% | -80.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.23% | 84.49% | -84.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.23% | 84.49% | -84.26% |
MMKT vs. ASMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMKT has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ASMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MMKT vs. ASMG - Dividend Comparison
MMKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, less than ASMG's 4.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ASMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF | 4.92% | 11.20% | 0.00% |
MMKT Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF | 3.73% | 3.98% | 1.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMKT and ASMG have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASMG has higher volatility (29.17%) compared to MMKT (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMKT dropped -0.04% vs ASMG's -43.95%.
On 1-year performance, ASMG leads with 308.54% vs 3.81% for MMKT. On fees, MMKT is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, MMKT has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ASMG has performed better with a 308.54% return vs 3.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MMKT is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ASMG.
ASMG has the higher dividend yield at 4.92%, compared with 3.73% for MMKT.
MMKT is categorized as Money Market, while ASMG is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Texas Capital and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MMKT and 0.75% for ASMG.
MMKT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.49 vs 3.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MMKT and ASMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer