PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMKT vs. ASMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMKT vs. ASMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMKT achieves a 1.44% return, which is significantly lower than ASMG's 127.56% return.


MMKT

1D
0.01%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.44%
6M
1.76%
1Y
3.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ASMG

1D
2.43%
1M
49.91%
YTD
127.56%
6M
96.41%
1Y
308.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMKT vs. ASMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MMKT and ASMG is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025

-0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMKT vs. ASMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMKT
MMKT Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
MMKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMKT Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
MMKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMKT Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

ASMG
ASMG Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ASMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ASMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASMG Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMKT vs. ASMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MMKTASMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+12.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+59.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

15.14

1.42

+13.72

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

153.44

8.99

+144.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

910.67

22.40

+888.27

MMKT vs. ASMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMKT Sharpe Ratio is 16.49, which is higher than the ASMG Sharpe Ratio of 3.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMKT and ASMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MMKTASMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.49

3.83

+12.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

17.60

1.89

+15.71

Drawdowns

MMKT vs. ASMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMKT drawdown since its inception was -0.04%, smaller than the maximum ASMG drawdown of -43.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMKT and ASMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMKTASMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.04%

-43.95%

+43.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.02%

-34.56%

+34.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

-13.28%

+13.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

13.85%

-13.85%

Volatility

MMKT vs. ASMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) is 0.05%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG) has a volatility of 29.17%. This indicates that MMKT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMKTASMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.05%

29.17%

-29.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.13%

64.23%

-64.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23%

81.15%

-80.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.23%

84.49%

-84.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.23%

84.49%

-84.26%

MMKT vs. ASMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMKT has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ASMG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMKT vs. ASMG - Dividend Comparison

MMKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, less than ASMG's 4.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
ASMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF
4.92%11.20%0.00%
MMKT
Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF
3.73%3.98%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


MMKT and ASMG have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASMG has higher volatility (29.17%) compared to MMKT (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMKT dropped -0.04% vs ASMG's -43.95%.

On 1-year performance, ASMG leads with 308.54% vs 3.81% for MMKT. On fees, MMKT is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, MMKT has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ASMG has performed better with a 308.54% return vs 3.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MMKT is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ASMG.

ASMG has the higher dividend yield at 4.92%, compared with 3.73% for MMKT.

MMKT is categorized as Money Market, while ASMG is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Texas Capital and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MMKT and 0.75% for ASMG.

MMKT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.49 vs 3.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMKT and ASMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer