MMIT vs. VTES

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MMIT (IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF) and VTES (Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares) are both Municipal Bonds funds. MMIT is actively managed, while VTES is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MMIT returned 3.85%/yr vs 3.23%/yr for VTES. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MMIT charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VTES.

Performance

MMIT vs. VTES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMIT) and Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares (VTES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMIT achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly higher than VTES's 0.66% return.

MMIT

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 1.40%
• 6M: 1.79%
• 1Y: 6.45%
• 3Y*: 3.85%
• 5Y*: 1.11%
• 10Y*: —

VTES

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 0.66%
• 6M: 1.02%
• 1Y: 3.63%
• 3Y*: 3.23%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMIT vs. VTES - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MMIT IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF	1.40%	5.03%	1.46%	4.86%
VTES Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares	0.66%	4.19%	1.85%	3.32%

Correlation

The correlation between MMIT and VTES is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2023	0.67

The correlation between MMIT and VTES shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MMIT vs. VTES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMIT

MMIT Risk / Return Rank: 70
MMIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
MMIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
MMIT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
MMIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
MMIT Martin Ratio Rank: 51

VTES

VTES Risk / Return Rank: 73
VTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
VTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
VTES Omega Ratio Rank: 94
VTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
VTES Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMIT vs. VTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMIT) and Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares (VTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MMIT	VTES	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.56	2.94	-0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.79	4.26	-0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.70	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	2.48	+0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.50	7.36	+1.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MMIT vs. VTES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMIT Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the VTES Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMIT and VTES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MMIT	VTES	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.56	2.94	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	1.81	-1.18

Drawdowns

MMIT vs. VTES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMIT drawdown since its inception was -12.28%, which is greater than VTES's maximum drawdown of -2.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMIT and VTES.

Drawdown Indicators

	MMIT	VTES	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.28%	-2.42%	-9.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.59%	-1.47%	-1.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.96%	-1.80%	-2.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.28%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.77%	-0.62%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.27%	-0.50%	-1.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.76%	0.49%	+0.27%

Volatility

MMIT vs. VTES - Volatility Comparison

IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMIT) has a higher volatility of 0.77% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares (VTES) at 0.35%. This indicates that MMIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MMIT	VTES	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.77%	0.35%	+0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.66%	0.97%	+0.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.53%	1.24%	+1.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.54%	1.72%	+1.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.30%	1.72%	+2.58%

MMIT vs. VTES - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMIT has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than VTES's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

MMIT vs. VTES - Dividend Comparison

MMIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than VTES's 2.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MMIT IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF	3.57%	3.54%	3.76%	3.46%	2.30%	1.81%	2.59%	4.14%	2.46%	0.35%
VTES Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares	2.75%	2.77%	2.99%	2.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MMIT and VTES in my portfolio?

MMIT and VTES have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MMIT or VTES?

MMIT has higher volatility (0.77%) compared to VTES (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMIT dropped -12.28% vs VTES's -2.42%.

Which ETF is better, MMIT or VTES?

On 3-year performance, MMIT leads with 3.85% vs 3.23% for VTES. On fees, VTES is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VTES has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MMIT or VTES?

Over the 3-year period, MMIT has performed better with a 3.85% return vs 3.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MMIT or VTES?

VTES is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for MMIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MMIT or VTES?

MMIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 2.75% for VTES.

What is the main difference between MMIT and VTES?

They also come from different issuers: New York Life and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for MMIT and 0.07% for VTES.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VTES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.