MMIT vs. RVNU
MMIT (IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF) and RVNU (Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. MMIT is actively managed, while RVNU is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MMIT returned 1.11%/yr vs -0.23%/yr for RVNU. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MMIT charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for RVNU.
Performance
MMIT vs. RVNU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMIT achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than RVNU's 3.71% return.
MMIT
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- 1Y
- 6.45%
- 3Y*
- 3.85%
- 5Y*
- 1.11%
- 10Y*
- —
RVNU
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 3.71%
- 6M
- 3.08%
- 1Y
- 9.62%
- 3Y*
- 3.65%
- 5Y*
- -0.23%
- 10Y*
- 1.90%
MMIT vs. RVNU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMIT IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF | 1.40% | 5.03% | 1.46% | 5.42% | -7.40% | 1.55% | 6.17% | 7.49% | 2.41% | 0.43% |
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF | 3.71% | 0.58% | 1.46% | 11.19% | -16.60% | 2.28% | 6.54% | 10.16% | -0.56% | 1.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMIT and RVNU is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2017 | 0.58 |
The correlation between MMIT and RVNU shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMIT vs. RVNU — Risk / Return Rank
MMIT
RVNU
MMIT vs. RVNU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMIT) and Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MMIT | RVNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.36 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 3.92 | -1.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.50 | 11.69 | -3.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MMIT | RVNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.56 | 1.89 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | -0.03 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.39 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
MMIT vs. RVNU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMIT drawdown since its inception was -12.28%, smaller than the maximum RVNU drawdown of -23.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMIT and RVNU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMIT | RVNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.28% | -23.51% | +11.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.59% | -2.46% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.96% | -10.35% | +6.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.28% | -23.51% | +11.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -2.80% | +2.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.27% | -4.98% | +2.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.76% | 0.83% | -0.07% |
Volatility
MMIT vs. RVNU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMIT) is 0.77%, while Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU) has a volatility of 1.42%. This indicates that MMIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RVNU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMIT | RVNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.77% | 1.42% | -0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.66% | 3.41% | -1.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53% | 5.12% | -2.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.54% | 7.19% | -3.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.30% | 7.27% | -2.97% |
MMIT vs. RVNU - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMIT has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than RVNU's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
MMIT vs. RVNU - Dividend Comparison
MMIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than RVNU's 3.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMIT IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF | 3.57% | 3.54% | 3.76% | 3.46% | 2.30% | 1.81% | 2.59% | 4.14% | 2.46% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF | 3.52% | 3.46% | 3.06% | 2.79% | 2.81% | 2.18% | 2.43% | 2.75% | 2.76% | 2.49% | 2.72% | 3.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMIT and RVNU have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RVNU has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to MMIT (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMIT dropped -12.28% vs RVNU's -23.51%.
On 5-year performance, MMIT leads with 1.11% vs -0.23% for RVNU. On fees, RVNU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MMIT has been the lower-risk option at 0.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MMIT has performed better with a 1.11% return vs -0.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RVNU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for MMIT.
MMIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 3.52% for RVNU.
They also come from different issuers: New York Life and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for MMIT and 0.15% for RVNU.
MMIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MMIT and RVNU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer