MMIT vs. IBMM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MMIT (IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF) and IBMM (iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. MMIT is actively managed, while IBMM is passively managed. MMIT charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IBMM.

Performance

MMIT vs. IBMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMIT) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MMIT

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 1.40%
• 6M: 1.79%
• 1Y: 6.45%
• 3Y*: 3.85%
• 5Y*: 1.11%
• 10Y*: —

IBMM

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMIT vs. IBMM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
MMIT IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF	0.11%
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

MMIT vs. IBMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMIT

MMIT Risk / Return Rank: 70
MMIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
MMIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
MMIT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
MMIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
MMIT Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMIT vs. IBMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMIT) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MMIT	IBMM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.56	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.79	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.50	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MMIT	IBMM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.56	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	—	—

Drawdowns

MMIT vs. IBMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMIT drawdown since its inception was -12.28%, which is greater than IBMM's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMIT and IBMM.

Drawdown Indicators

	MMIT	IBMM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.28%	0.00%	-12.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.59%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.28%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.77%	0.00%	-0.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.27%	0.00%	-2.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.76%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MMIT	IBMM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.77%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.66%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.53%	0.00%	+2.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.54%	0.00%	+3.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.30%	0.00%	+4.30%

MMIT vs. IBMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMIT has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than IBMM's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

MMIT vs. IBMM - Dividend Comparison

MMIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, while IBMM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MMIT IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF	3.57%	3.54%	3.76%	3.46%	2.30%	1.81%	2.59%	4.14%	2.46%	0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, MMIT or IBMM?

On fees, IBMM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MMIT or IBMM?

IBMM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for MMIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MMIT or IBMM?

MMIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 0.00% for IBMM.

What is the main difference between MMIT and IBMM?

They also come from different issuers: New York Life and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for MMIT and 0.18% for IBMM.