MMID vs. SRHQ
MMID (MFS Active Mid Cap ETF) and SRHQ (SRH U.S. Quality ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. MMID is actively managed, while SRHQ is passively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MMID charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SRHQ.
Performance
MMID vs. SRHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMID achieves a 2.28% return, which is significantly lower than SRHQ's 11.72% return.
MMID
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 2.28%
- 6M
- 2.54%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SRHQ
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 11.72%
- 6M
- 13.52%
- 1Y
- 21.95%
- 3Y*
- 17.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MMID vs. SRHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MMID MFS Active Mid Cap ETF | 2.28% | 1.49% |
SRHQ SRH U.S. Quality ETF | 11.72% | 2.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMID and SRHQ is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMID vs. SRHQ — Risk / Return Rank
MMID
SRHQ
MMID vs. SRHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Active Mid Cap ETF (MMID) and SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MMID | SRHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 1.06 | -0.65 |
Drawdowns
MMID vs. SRHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMID drawdown since its inception was -7.93%, smaller than the maximum SRHQ drawdown of -18.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMID and SRHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMID | SRHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.93% | -18.50% | +10.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.31% | -1.72% | -0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.14% | -3.08% | +0.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.84% | — |
Volatility
MMID vs. SRHQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMID | SRHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.48% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.57% | 14.75% | -1.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.57% | 16.03% | -2.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.57% | 16.03% | -2.46% |
MMID vs. SRHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMID has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SRHQ's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MMID vs. SRHQ - Dividend Comparison
MMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than SRHQ's 0.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMID MFS Active Mid Cap ETF | 0.49% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRHQ SRH U.S. Quality ETF | 0.71% | 0.76% | 0.66% | 0.84% | 0.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMID and SRHQ have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SRHQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SRHQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MMID.
SRHQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.49% for MMID.
They also come from different issuers: MFS and SRH. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MMID and 0.35% for SRHQ.
Find the right allocation for MMID and SRHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer