MMID vs. RSHO
MMID (MFS Active Mid Cap ETF) and RSHO (Tema American Reshoring ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MMID charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for RSHO.
Performance
MMID vs. RSHO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMID achieves a 2.28% return, which is significantly lower than RSHO's 33.69% return.
MMID
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 2.28%
- 6M
- 2.54%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSHO
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 7.69%
- YTD
- 33.69%
- 6M
- 33.85%
- 1Y
- 57.71%
- 3Y*
- 31.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MMID vs. RSHO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MMID MFS Active Mid Cap ETF | 2.28% | 1.49% |
RSHO Tema American Reshoring ETF | 33.69% | 4.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMID and RSHO is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2025 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMID vs. RSHO — Risk / Return Rank
MMID
RSHO
MMID vs. RSHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Active Mid Cap ETF (MMID) and Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MMID | RSHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 1.48 | -1.06 |
Drawdowns
MMID vs. RSHO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMID drawdown since its inception was -7.93%, smaller than the maximum RSHO drawdown of -27.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMID and RSHO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMID | RSHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.93% | -27.31% | +19.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.31% | 0.00% | -2.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.14% | -4.32% | +2.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.82% | — |
Volatility
MMID vs. RSHO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMID | RSHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.09% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.57% | 23.74% | -10.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.57% | 22.55% | -8.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.57% | 22.55% | -8.98% |
MMID vs. RSHO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMID has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than RSHO's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MMID vs. RSHO - Dividend Comparison
MMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, more than RSHO's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MMID MFS Active Mid Cap ETF | 0.49% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSHO Tema American Reshoring ETF | 0.22% | 0.30% | 0.26% | 0.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMID and RSHO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MMID is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MMID is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RSHO.
MMID has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.22% for RSHO.
They also come from different issuers: MFS and Tema. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MMID and 0.75% for RSHO.
Find the right allocation for MMID and RSHO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer