MMID vs. MFSB
MMID (MFS Active Mid Cap ETF) and MFSB (MFS Active Core Plus Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MMID is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by MFS, while MFSB is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by MFS. Both are actively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MMID charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for MFSB.
Performance
MMID vs. MFSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMID achieves a 2.28% return, which is significantly higher than MFSB's 0.56% return.
MMID
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 2.28%
- 6M
- 2.54%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFSB
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 0.56%
- 6M
- 0.61%
- 1Y
- 6.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MMID vs. MFSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MMID MFS Active Mid Cap ETF | 2.28% | 1.49% |
MFSB MFS Active Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.56% | 1.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMID and MFSB is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMID vs. MFSB — Risk / Return Rank
MMID
MFSB
MMID vs. MFSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Active Mid Cap ETF (MMID) and MFS Active Core Plus Bond ETF (MFSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MMID | MFSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 1.01 | -0.60 |
Drawdowns
MMID vs. MFSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMID drawdown since its inception was -7.93%, which is greater than MFSB's maximum drawdown of -3.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMID and MFSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMID | MFSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.93% | -3.19% | -4.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.31% | -1.26% | -1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.14% | -0.82% | -1.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.86% | — |
Volatility
MMID vs. MFSB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMID | MFSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.33% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.68% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.57% | 3.64% | +9.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.57% | 4.23% | +9.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.57% | 4.23% | +9.34% |
MMID vs. MFSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMID has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than MFSB's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
MMID vs. MFSB - Dividend Comparison
MMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than MFSB's 4.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MFSB MFS Active Core Plus Bond ETF | 4.59% | 4.58% | 0.37% |
MMID MFS Active Mid Cap ETF | 0.49% | 0.28% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMID and MFSB have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MFSB is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MFSB is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MMID.
MFSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 0.49% for MMID.
MMID is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while MFSB is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MMID and 0.34% for MFSB.
Find the right allocation for MMID and MFSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer