MMID vs. LST
MMID (MFS Active Mid Cap ETF) and LST (Leuthold Select Industries ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MMID charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LST.
Performance
MMID vs. LST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMID achieves a 2.28% return, which is significantly lower than LST's 16.81% return.
MMID
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 2.28%
- 6M
- 2.54%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LST
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 7.41%
- YTD
- 16.81%
- 6M
- 18.46%
- 1Y
- 34.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MMID vs. LST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MMID MFS Active Mid Cap ETF | 2.28% | 1.49% |
LST Leuthold Select Industries ETF | 16.81% | 2.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMID and LST is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMID vs. LST — Risk / Return Rank
MMID
LST
MMID vs. LST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Active Mid Cap ETF (MMID) and Leuthold Select Industries ETF (LST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MMID | LST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 1.38 | -0.97 |
Drawdowns
MMID vs. LST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMID drawdown since its inception was -7.93%, smaller than the maximum LST drawdown of -19.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMID and LST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMID | LST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.93% | -19.47% | +11.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.31% | -0.18% | -2.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.14% | -2.92% | +0.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.61% | — |
Volatility
MMID vs. LST - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMID | LST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.72% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.57% | 14.33% | -0.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.57% | 17.93% | -4.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.57% | 17.93% | -4.36% |
MMID vs. LST - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMID has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than LST's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
MMID vs. LST - Dividend Comparison
MMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than LST's 1.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LST Leuthold Select Industries ETF | 1.15% | 1.34% |
MMID MFS Active Mid Cap ETF | 0.49% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMID and LST have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MMID is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MMID is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LST.
LST has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.49% for MMID.
They also come from different issuers: MFS and Leuthold Group. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MMID and 0.65% for LST.
Find the right allocation for MMID and LST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer