PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMHYX vs. HIMFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMHYX vs. HIMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Municipal High Income Fund (MMHYX) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3 (HIMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMHYX achieves a 2.93% return, which is significantly higher than HIMFX's 2.57% return.


MMHYX

1D
0.13%
1M
2.14%
YTD
2.93%
6M
3.47%
1Y
8.43%
3Y*
5.73%
5Y*
0.93%
10Y*
2.81%

HIMFX

1D
0.06%
1M
1.86%
YTD
2.57%
6M
3.09%
1Y
8.39%
3Y*
6.01%
5Y*
1.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMHYX vs. HIMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMHYX
MFS Municipal High Income Fund
2.93%5.02%6.72%5.30%-14.64%5.31%3.39%9.94%2.09%6.96%
HIMFX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3
2.57%4.69%6.23%7.89%-12.36%5.60%4.74%8.92%1.91%8.22%

Correlation

The correlation between MMHYX and HIMFX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.88

The correlation between MMHYX and HIMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMHYX vs. HIMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMHYX
MMHYX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
MMHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
MMHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

HIMFX
HIMFX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
HIMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
HIMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMHYX vs. HIMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Municipal High Income Fund (MMHYX) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3 (HIMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MMHYXHIMFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.68

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

3.05

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.22

10.97

-0.75

MMHYX vs. HIMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMHYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the HIMFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMHYX and HIMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MMHYX vs. HIMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMHYX drawdown since its inception was -23.28%, which is greater than HIMFX's maximum drawdown of -17.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMHYX and HIMFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMHYXHIMFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.28%

-17.57%

-5.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.91%

-2.76%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.71%

-6.17%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.89%

-17.57%

-2.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.88%

-3.15%

+0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

0.77%

+0.06%

Volatility

MMHYX vs. HIMFX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Municipal High Income Fund (MMHYX) has a higher volatility of 0.96% compared to American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3 (HIMFX) at 0.76%. This indicates that MMHYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HIMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMHYXHIMFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

0.76%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.49%

2.22%

+0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.38%

3.04%

+0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.95%

4.82%

+0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.84%

4.59%

+0.25%

MMHYX vs. HIMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMHYX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than HIMFX's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMHYX vs. HIMFX - Dividend Comparison

MMHYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, more than HIMFX's 4.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HIMFX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3
4.22%4.32%3.83%3.71%2.80%3.54%3.73%3.49%3.99%3.61%0.00%0.00%
MMHYX
MFS Municipal High Income Fund
4.34%5.77%3.91%3.59%3.03%2.95%3.57%3.99%4.18%4.38%4.31%4.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


MMHYX and HIMFX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MMHYX has higher volatility (0.96%) compared to HIMFX (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMHYX dropped -23.28% vs HIMFX's -17.57%.

HIMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMHYX and HIMFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer