MMHYX vs. MEIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Municipal High Income Fund (MMHYX) and MFS Value Fund (MEIAX).
MMHYX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Feb 23, 1984. MEIAX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Jan 2, 1996.
Performance
MMHYX vs. MEIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MMHYX vs. MEIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMHYX MFS Municipal High Income Fund | -0.10% | 5.02% | 6.72% | 5.30% | -14.64% | 5.31% | 3.39% | 9.94% | 2.09% | 7.66% |
MEIAX MFS Value Fund | 1.01% | 12.97% | 11.60% | 7.92% | -6.25% | 25.11% | 3.71% | 29.73% | -10.11% | 16.97% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMHYX achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly lower than MEIAX's 1.01% return. Over the past 10 years, MMHYX has underperformed MEIAX with an annualized return of 2.78%, while MEIAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.65% annualized return.
MMHYX
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- -0.10%
- 6M
- 1.57%
- 1Y
- 3.37%
- 3Y*
- 4.84%
- 5Y*
- 0.89%
- 10Y*
- 2.78%
MEIAX
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- -5.04%
- YTD
- 1.01%
- 6M
- 3.48%
- 1Y
- 10.10%
- 3Y*
- 11.75%
- 5Y*
- 8.09%
- 10Y*
- 9.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MMHYX vs. MEIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMHYX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than MEIAX's 0.80% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MMHYX vs. MEIAX — Risk / Return Rank
MMHYX
MEIAX
MMHYX vs. MEIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Municipal High Income Fund (MMHYX) and MFS Value Fund (MEIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MMHYX | MEIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.65 | 0.67 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.89 | 1.01 | -0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.15 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | 0.99 | -0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.42 | 4.36 | -1.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MMHYX | MEIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 0.67 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.58 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.58 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.11 | 0.58 | +0.53 |
Correlation
The correlation between MMHYX and MEIAX is -0.06. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
MMHYX vs. MEIAX - Dividend Comparison
MMHYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, less than MEIAX's 9.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMHYX MFS Municipal High Income Fund | 4.37% | 5.77% | 3.91% | 3.59% | 3.03% | 2.95% | 3.57% | 3.99% | 4.18% | 4.38% | 4.31% | 4.64% |
MEIAX MFS Value Fund | 9.44% | 9.34% | 9.10% | 8.21% | 7.36% | 3.10% | 2.42% | 2.97% | 3.36% | 3.87% | 2.84% | 5.73% |
Drawdowns
MMHYX vs. MEIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMHYX drawdown since its inception was -23.28%, smaller than the maximum MEIAX drawdown of -52.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMHYX and MEIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMHYX | MEIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.28% | -52.85% | +29.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.86% | -11.10% | +5.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.89% | -17.72% | -2.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.89% | -36.71% | +16.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.38% | -5.04% | +2.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.89% | -6.57% | +3.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 2.53% | -0.53% |
Volatility
MMHYX vs. MEIAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS Municipal High Income Fund (MMHYX) is 1.27%, while MFS Value Fund (MEIAX) has a volatility of 3.64%. This indicates that MMHYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MEIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MMHYX | MEIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.27% | 3.64% | -2.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.05% | 7.85% | -5.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.98% | 14.83% | -8.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.90% | 13.91% | -9.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.82% | 16.55% | -11.73% |