MMGPX vs. WWNPX
MMGPX (Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio) and WWNPX (Kinetics Paradigm Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, MMGPX returned -3.53%/yr vs 14.05%/yr for WWNPX. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MMGPX charges 0.04%/yr vs 1.64%/yr for WWNPX.
Performance
MMGPX vs. WWNPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMGPX achieves a 6.58% return, which is significantly lower than WWNPX's 18.51% return.
MMGPX
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- 5.85%
- YTD
- 6.58%
- 6M
- 2.50%
- 1Y
- 4.84%
- 3Y*
- 26.16%
- 5Y*
- -3.53%
- 10Y*
- —
WWNPX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -10.79%
- YTD
- 18.51%
- 6M
- 12.21%
- 1Y
- -3.20%
- 3Y*
- 30.17%
- 5Y*
- 14.05%
- 10Y*
- 18.16%
MMGPX vs. WWNPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio | 6.58% | 12.58% | 41.83% | 44.34% | -63.37% | -11.55% | 152.67% | 40.20% | 10.89% | 28.18% |
WWNPX Kinetics Paradigm Fund | 18.51% | -14.61% | 88.34% | -16.97% | 29.18% | 38.14% | 3.38% | 30.47% | -5.24% | 24.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMGPX and WWNPX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMGPX vs. WWNPX — Risk / Return Rank
MMGPX
WWNPX
MMGPX vs. WWNPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX) and Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MMGPX | WWNPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.02 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.22 | -0.09 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.47 | -0.18 | +0.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MMGPX | WWNPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 | -0.06 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 | 0.43 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.52 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
MMGPX vs. WWNPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMGPX drawdown since its inception was -75.38%, which is greater than WWNPX's maximum drawdown of -67.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMGPX and WWNPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMGPX | WWNPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.38% | -67.87% | -7.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.79% | -23.22% | -4.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.27% | -41.13% | +11.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.70% | -41.13% | -31.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.32% | -28.17% | -8.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.24% | -13.90% | -16.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.11% | 11.52% | +1.59% |
Volatility
MMGPX vs. WWNPX - Volatility Comparison
Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX) has a higher volatility of 8.88% compared to Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX) at 7.16%. This indicates that MMGPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WWNPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMGPX | WWNPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.88% | 7.16% | +1.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.96% | 26.77% | -5.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.57% | 32.74% | -5.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.71% | 32.84% | +6.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.22% | 28.58% | +6.64% |
MMGPX vs. WWNPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMGPX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than WWNPX's 1.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
MMGPX vs. WWNPX - Dividend Comparison
MMGPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than WWNPX's 6.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio | 0.40% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 125.40% | 64.53% | 7.93% | 15.63% | 28.02% |
WWNPX Kinetics Paradigm Fund | 6.93% | 8.21% | 2.95% | 5.65% | 2.00% | 1.67% | 2.15% | 1.00% | 10.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMGPX and WWNPX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MMGPX has higher volatility (8.88%) compared to WWNPX (7.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMGPX dropped -75.38% vs WWNPX's -67.87%.
MMGPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MMGPX and WWNPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer