MMGPX vs. AWMIX
MMGPX (Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio) and AWMIX (CIBC Atlas Mid Cap Equity Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, MMGPX returned -7.25%/yr vs 3.34%/yr for AWMIX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MMGPX charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for AWMIX.
Performance
MMGPX vs. AWMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMGPX achieves a -2.33% return, which is significantly lower than AWMIX's 9.87% return.
MMGPX
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -4.55%
- YTD
- -2.33%
- 6M
- -5.94%
- 1Y
- -6.55%
- 3Y*
- 22.02%
- 5Y*
- -7.25%
- 10Y*
- —
AWMIX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 4.12%
- YTD
- 9.87%
- 6M
- 8.24%
- 1Y
- 9.41%
- 3Y*
- 8.73%
- 5Y*
- 3.34%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
MMGPX vs. AWMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio | -2.33% | 12.58% | 41.83% | 44.34% | -63.37% | -11.55% | 152.67% | 40.20% | 10.89% | 28.18% |
AWMIX CIBC Atlas Mid Cap Equity Fund | 9.87% | 2.14% | 4.16% | 19.63% | -23.66% | 19.86% | 18.38% | 34.57% | -6.76% | 18.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMGPX and AWMIX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017 | 0.75 |
The correlation between MMGPX and AWMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMGPX vs. AWMIX — Risk / Return Rank
MMGPX
AWMIX
MMGPX vs. AWMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX) and CIBC Atlas Mid Cap Equity Fund (AWMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MMGPX | AWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.12 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 1.00 | -1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.40 | 3.28 | -3.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MMGPX vs. AWMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMGPX drawdown since its inception was -75.38%, which is greater than AWMIX's maximum drawdown of -37.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMGPX and AWMIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMGPX | AWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.38% | -37.53% | -37.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.79% | -10.42% | -17.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.27% | -28.10% | -1.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.70% | -29.81% | -42.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.64% | -2.98% | -38.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.29% | -7.32% | -22.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.62% | 3.18% | +10.44% |
Volatility
MMGPX vs. AWMIX - Volatility Comparison
Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX) has a higher volatility of 9.77% compared to CIBC Atlas Mid Cap Equity Fund (AWMIX) at 5.57%. This indicates that MMGPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AWMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMGPX | AWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.77% | 5.57% | +4.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.75% | 12.30% | +9.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.61% | 15.53% | +13.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.83% | 20.01% | +19.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.22% | 20.28% | +14.94% |
MMGPX vs. AWMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMGPX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than AWMIX's 0.83% expense ratio.
Dividends
MMGPX vs. AWMIX - Dividend Comparison
MMGPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than AWMIX's 10.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWMIX CIBC Atlas Mid Cap Equity Fund | 10.24% | 11.25% | 0.00% | 4.34% | 1.57% | 10.46% | 2.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.34% | 0.09% |
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio | 0.44% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 125.40% | 64.53% | 7.93% | 15.63% | 28.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMGPX and AWMIX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MMGPX has higher volatility (9.77%) compared to AWMIX (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMGPX dropped -75.38% vs AWMIX's -37.53%.
AWMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MMGPX and AWMIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer