PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMDAX vs. MENYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMDAX vs. MENYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Moderate Allocation Fund (MMDAX) and Madison Covered Call & Equity Income Fund (MENYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMDAX achieves a 8.81% return, which is significantly higher than MENYX's 5.89% return. Over the past 10 years, MMDAX has underperformed MENYX with an annualized return of 6.40%, while MENYX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.15% annualized return.


MMDAX

1D
0.33%
1M
4.09%
YTD
8.81%
6M
9.30%
1Y
17.63%
3Y*
11.10%
5Y*
4.53%
10Y*
6.40%

MENYX

1D
-0.52%
1M
-1.74%
YTD
5.89%
6M
5.72%
1Y
13.92%
3Y*
6.86%
5Y*
6.20%
10Y*
8.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMDAX vs. MENYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMDAX
Madison Moderate Allocation Fund
8.81%11.13%6.97%10.32%-14.49%6.79%9.77%15.99%-4.80%14.29%
MENYX
Madison Covered Call & Equity Income Fund
5.89%6.69%2.79%10.66%5.06%18.71%12.65%15.76%-6.01%7.57%

Correlation

The correlation between MMDAX and MENYX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2009

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between MMDAX and MENYX has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMDAX vs. MENYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMDAX
MMDAX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
MMDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MMDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

MENYX
MENYX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
MENYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MENYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
MENYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
MENYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
MENYX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMDAX vs. MENYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Moderate Allocation Fund (MMDAX) and Madison Covered Call & Equity Income Fund (MENYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MMDAXMENYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.30

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

3.74

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.93

10.57

+0.35

MMDAX vs. MENYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMDAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the MENYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMDAX and MENYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MMDAXMENYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

1.65

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.55

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.61

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.61

-0.17

Drawdowns

MMDAX vs. MENYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMDAX drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, which is greater than MENYX's maximum drawdown of -28.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMDAX and MENYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMDAXMENYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.12%

-28.38%

-14.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.05%

-4.07%

-2.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.02%

-16.14%

+6.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

-16.14%

-9.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.36%

-28.38%

+3.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.24%

+2.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.37%

-2.50%

-4.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

1.44%

+0.22%

Volatility

MMDAX vs. MENYX - Volatility Comparison

Madison Moderate Allocation Fund (MMDAX) has a higher volatility of 2.87% compared to Madison Covered Call & Equity Income Fund (MENYX) at 2.73%. This indicates that MMDAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MENYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMDAXMENYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

2.73%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.02%

6.85%

+0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.51%

9.27%

-0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.75%

11.43%

-0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.70%

13.46%

-2.76%

MMDAX vs. MENYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMDAX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than MENYX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMDAX vs. MENYX - Dividend Comparison

MMDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.63%, less than MENYX's 8.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MENYX
Madison Covered Call & Equity Income Fund
8.17%8.52%7.83%7.71%6.98%6.48%6.34%7.07%9.82%7.64%6.74%7.48%
MMDAX
Madison Moderate Allocation Fund
5.63%6.12%3.70%2.15%1.39%8.46%9.24%3.95%9.05%5.13%4.36%7.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MMDAX and MENYX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MMDAX has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to MENYX (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMDAX dropped -43.12% vs MENYX's -28.38%.

MMDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMDAX and MENYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer