MMCFX vs. ARDEX
MMCFX (AMG Veritas China Fund) and ARDEX (AMG River Road Dividend All Cap Value Fund) are both mutual funds - MMCFX is a China Equities fund managed by AMG, while ARDEX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by AMG. Over the past 10 years, MMCFX returned 5.59%/yr vs 4.20%/yr for ARDEX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MMCFX charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for ARDEX.
Performance
MMCFX vs. ARDEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMCFX achieves a 9.00% return, which is significantly lower than ARDEX's 10.03% return. Over the past 10 years, MMCFX has outperformed ARDEX with an annualized return of 5.59%, while ARDEX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.20% annualized return.
MMCFX
- 1D
- 3.02%
- 1M
- 3.93%
- YTD
- 9.00%
- 6M
- 8.69%
- 1Y
- 26.72%
- 3Y*
- 5.18%
- 5Y*
- -6.52%
- 10Y*
- 5.59%
ARDEX
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- 10.03%
- 6M
- 9.59%
- 1Y
- -7.28%
- 3Y*
- 4.16%
- 5Y*
- 0.05%
- 10Y*
- 4.20%
MMCFX vs. ARDEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMCFX AMG Veritas China Fund | 9.00% | 27.88% | -0.59% | -18.35% | -26.33% | -0.49% | 17.79% | 27.49% | -5.22% | 24.07% |
ARDEX AMG River Road Dividend All Cap Value Fund | 10.03% | -14.13% | 16.20% | 2.04% | -3.64% | 4.16% | -2.18% | 23.20% | -7.61% | 8.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMCFX and ARDEX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2005 | 0.69 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MMCFX and ARDEX has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMCFX vs. ARDEX — Risk / Return Rank
MMCFX
ARDEX
MMCFX vs. ARDEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Veritas China Fund (MMCFX) and AMG River Road Dividend All Cap Value Fund (ARDEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MMCFX | ARDEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 0.94 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | -0.34 | +1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.98 | -0.64 | +3.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MMCFX vs. ARDEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMCFX drawdown since its inception was -70.40%, which is greater than ARDEX's maximum drawdown of -52.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMCFX and ARDEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMCFX | ARDEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.40% | -52.16% | -18.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.42% | -20.51% | +2.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.01% | -52.16% | +23.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.12% | -52.16% | -4.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.48% | -52.16% | -5.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.96% | -47.15% | +14.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.68% | -10.55% | -16.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.53% | 10.96% | -2.43% |
Volatility
MMCFX vs. ARDEX - Volatility Comparison
AMG Veritas China Fund (MMCFX) has a higher volatility of 10.15% compared to AMG River Road Dividend All Cap Value Fund (ARDEX) at 2.71%. This indicates that MMCFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARDEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMCFX | ARDEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.15% | 2.71% | +7.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.37% | 23.60% | -6.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.85% | 22.41% | +0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.56% | 41.86% | -16.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.85% | 32.41% | -7.56% |
MMCFX vs. ARDEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMCFX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than ARDEX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
MMCFX vs. ARDEX - Dividend Comparison
MMCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than ARDEX's 4.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARDEX AMG River Road Dividend All Cap Value Fund | 4.68% | 5.85% | 79.78% | 4.42% | 14.36% | 5.37% | 2.12% | 8.71% | 9.10% | 6.83% | 9.31% | 11.69% |
MMCFX AMG Veritas China Fund | 0.30% | 0.32% | 1.34% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 114.57% | 4.66% | 9.14% | 25.03% | 12.44% | 0.35% | 12.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMCFX and ARDEX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MMCFX has higher volatility (10.15%) compared to ARDEX (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMCFX dropped -70.40% vs ARDEX's -52.16%.
MMCFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MMCFX and ARDEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer