PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARDEX vs. MBDFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARDEX vs. MBDFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG River Road Dividend All Cap Value Fund (ARDEX) and AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund (MBDFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARDEX achieves a 10.03% return, which is significantly higher than MBDFX's -0.05% return. Over the past 10 years, ARDEX has outperformed MBDFX with an annualized return of 4.16%, while MBDFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.27% annualized return.


ARDEX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.87%
YTD
10.03%
6M
-10.77%
1Y
-6.52%
3Y*
5.47%
5Y*
-0.70%
10Y*
4.16%

MBDFX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.22%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
-0.06%
1Y
5.01%
3Y*
3.84%
5Y*
-0.48%
10Y*
1.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARDEX vs. MBDFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARDEX
AMG River Road Dividend All Cap Value Fund
10.03%-14.13%16.20%2.04%-3.64%4.16%-2.18%23.20%-7.61%8.78%
MBDFX
AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund
-0.05%7.29%1.24%5.73%-13.85%-3.34%7.33%9.70%-1.11%3.88%

Correlation

The correlation between ARDEX and MBDFX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2005

-0.09

The correlation between ARDEX and MBDFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARDEX vs. MBDFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARDEX
ARDEX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
ARDEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARDEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARDEX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
ARDEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARDEX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

MBDFX
MBDFX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
MBDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
MBDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARDEX vs. MBDFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG River Road Dividend All Cap Value Fund (ARDEX) and AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund (MBDFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARDEXMBDFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.28

1.24

-1.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.17

1.82

-2.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.22

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.31

1.65

-1.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.60

4.84

-5.44

ARDEX vs. MBDFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARDEX Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the MBDFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARDEX and MBDFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARDEXMBDFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

1.24

-1.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

-0.08

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

0.25

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.48

-0.24

Drawdowns

ARDEX vs. MBDFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARDEX drawdown since its inception was -52.16%, which is greater than MBDFX's maximum drawdown of -20.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARDEX and MBDFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARDEXMBDFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.16%

-20.66%

-31.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.51%

-3.25%

-17.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.16%

-6.99%

-45.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.16%

-20.54%

-31.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.16%

-20.66%

-31.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.15%

-4.51%

-42.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.46%

-3.96%

-6.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.63%

1.11%

+9.52%

Volatility

ARDEX vs. MBDFX - Volatility Comparison

AMG River Road Dividend All Cap Value Fund (ARDEX) has a higher volatility of 1.94% compared to AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund (MBDFX) at 1.35%. This indicates that ARDEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBDFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARDEXMBDFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.94%

1.35%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.59%

2.79%

+20.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.42%

3.88%

+18.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.86%

6.15%

+35.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.41%

5.06%

+27.35%

ARDEX vs. MBDFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARDEX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than MBDFX's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARDEX vs. MBDFX - Dividend Comparison

ARDEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%, more than MBDFX's 3.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARDEX
AMG River Road Dividend All Cap Value Fund
4.68%5.85%79.78%4.42%14.36%5.37%2.12%8.71%9.10%6.83%9.31%11.69%
MBDFX
AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund
3.47%3.66%3.50%2.92%2.16%2.35%1.84%2.40%2.30%2.10%2.06%4.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARDEX and MBDFX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARDEX has higher volatility (1.94%) compared to MBDFX (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARDEX dropped -52.16% vs MBDFX's -20.66%.

MBDFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARDEX and MBDFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer