MMCFX vs. OBCHX
MMCFX (AMG Veritas China Fund) and OBCHX (Oberweis China Opportunities Fund) are both China Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MMCFX returned 6.10%/yr vs 11.54%/yr for OBCHX. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MMCFX charges 1.14%/yr vs 2.03%/yr for OBCHX.
Performance
MMCFX vs. OBCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMCFX achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly lower than OBCHX's 37.77% return. Over the past 10 years, MMCFX has underperformed OBCHX with an annualized return of 6.10%, while OBCHX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.54% annualized return.
MMCFX
- 1D
- 2.13%
- 1M
- 6.15%
- YTD
- 11.32%
- 6M
- 10.94%
- 1Y
- 28.65%
- 3Y*
- 8.24%
- 5Y*
- -6.48%
- 10Y*
- 6.10%
OBCHX
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 7.82%
- YTD
- 37.77%
- 6M
- 37.03%
- 1Y
- 66.76%
- 3Y*
- 28.29%
- 5Y*
- 2.11%
- 10Y*
- 11.54%
MMCFX vs. OBCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMCFX AMG Veritas China Fund | 11.32% | 27.88% | -0.59% | -18.35% | -26.33% | -0.49% | 17.79% | 27.49% | -5.22% | 24.07% |
OBCHX Oberweis China Opportunities Fund | 37.77% | 40.89% | 7.28% | -7.70% | -37.21% | -5.16% | 57.06% | 36.32% | -25.94% | 54.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMCFX and OBCHX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2005 | 0.63 |
The correlation between MMCFX and OBCHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.82 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMCFX vs. OBCHX — Risk / Return Rank
MMCFX
OBCHX
MMCFX vs. OBCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Veritas China Fund (MMCFX) and Oberweis China Opportunities Fund (OBCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MMCFX | OBCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.50 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 7.17 | -5.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.46 | 17.82 | -14.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MMCFX vs. OBCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMCFX drawdown since its inception was -70.40%, roughly equal to the maximum OBCHX drawdown of -74.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMCFX and OBCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMCFX | OBCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.40% | -74.03% | +3.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.42% | -9.59% | -8.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.01% | -23.88% | -5.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.12% | -52.17% | -4.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.48% | -59.47% | +1.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.53% | -8.16% | -23.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.68% | -25.67% | -1.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.53% | 3.85% | +4.68% |
Volatility
MMCFX vs. OBCHX - Volatility Comparison
AMG Veritas China Fund (MMCFX) and Oberweis China Opportunities Fund (OBCHX) have volatilities of 10.28% and 10.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMCFX | OBCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.28% | 10.00% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.49% | 17.60% | -0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.94% | 23.18% | -0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.58% | 26.97% | -1.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.87% | 25.24% | -0.37% |
MMCFX vs. OBCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMCFX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is lower than OBCHX's 2.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
MMCFX vs. OBCHX - Dividend Comparison
MMCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than OBCHX's 0.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMCFX AMG Veritas China Fund | 0.29% | 0.32% | 1.34% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 114.57% | 4.66% | 9.14% | 25.03% | 12.44% | 0.35% | 12.74% |
OBCHX Oberweis China Opportunities Fund | 0.73% | 1.01% | 2.16% | 0.46% | 1.22% | 41.65% | 11.50% | 3.37% | 26.11% | 6.26% | 0.81% | 11.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMCFX and OBCHX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MMCFX has higher volatility (10.28%) compared to OBCHX (10.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMCFX dropped -70.40% vs OBCHX's -74.03%.
OBCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MMCFX and OBCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer