MMCA vs. LRND

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MMCA (IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF) and LRND (IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MMCA is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by IndexIQ, while LRND is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Gross. MMCA is actively managed, while LRND is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MMCA returned 4.06%/yr vs 23.71%/yr for LRND. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MMCA charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for LRND.

Performance

MMCA vs. LRND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMCA) and IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF (LRND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMCA achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly lower than LRND's 11.98% return.

MMCA

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 0.66%
• 6M: 1.02%
• 1Y: 6.39%
• 3Y*: 4.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LRND

• 1D: -1.16%
• 1M: 7.42%
• YTD: 11.98%
• 6M: 11.46%
• 1Y: 34.53%
• 3Y*: 23.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMCA vs. LRND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MMCA IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF	0.66%	5.74%	1.70%	5.77%	-9.70%
LRND IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF	11.98%	20.31%	21.68%	44.13%	-19.33%

Correlation

The correlation between MMCA and LRND is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2022	0.18

MMCA vs. LRND - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MMCA	LRND
Financial Services	0.8%	0.0%
Basic Materials	-	0.9%
Communication Services	-	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.9%
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	10.1%
Industrials	-	5.5%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	57.8%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

MMCA vs. LRND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMCA

MMCA Risk / Return Rank: 66
MMCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
MMCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
MMCA Omega Ratio Rank: 85
MMCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
MMCA Martin Ratio Rank: 42

LRND

LRND Risk / Return Rank: 62
LRND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
LRND Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
LRND Omega Ratio Rank: 65
LRND Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
LRND Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMCA vs. LRND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMCA) and IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF (LRND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MMCA	LRND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	2.28	+0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.69	3.06	+0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.39	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.13	2.51	-0.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.78	10.01	-3.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MMCA vs. LRND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMCA Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the LRND Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMCA and LRND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MMCA	LRND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47	2.28	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.04	0.81	-0.77

Drawdowns

MMCA vs. LRND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMCA drawdown since its inception was -15.97%, smaller than the maximum LRND drawdown of -25.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMCA and LRND.

Drawdown Indicators

	MMCA	LRND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.97%	-25.43%	+9.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.01%	-13.83%	+10.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.68%	-21.06%	+17.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.53%	-1.16%	-0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.05%	-6.24%	-0.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.94%	3.46%	-2.52%

Volatility

MMCA vs. LRND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMCA) is 0.90%, while IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF (LRND) has a volatility of 3.73%. This indicates that MMCA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LRND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MMCA	LRND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.90%	3.73%	-2.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.89%	11.84%	-9.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.60%	15.24%	-12.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.61%	19.99%	-16.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.61%	19.99%	-16.38%

MMCA vs. LRND - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMCA has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than LRND's 0.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

MMCA vs. LRND - Dividend Comparison

MMCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than LRND's 0.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LRND IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF	0.49%	0.67%	0.97%	1.22%	1.32%	0.00%
MMCA IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF	3.29%	3.39%	3.66%	3.57%	2.90%	0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MMCA and LRND in my portfolio?

MMCA and LRND have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MMCA or LRND?

LRND has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to MMCA (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMCA dropped -15.97% vs LRND's -25.43%.

Which ETF is better, MMCA or LRND?

On 3-year performance, LRND leads with 23.71% vs 4.06% for MMCA. On fees, LRND is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, MMCA has been the lower-risk option at 0.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MMCA or LRND?

Over the 3-year period, LRND has performed better with a 23.71% return vs 4.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MMCA or LRND?

LRND is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for MMCA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MMCA or LRND?

MMCA has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 0.49% for LRND.

What is the main difference between MMCA and LRND?

MMCA is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while LRND is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for MMCA and 0.14% for LRND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MMCA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.