MMCA vs. DBE
MMCA (IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF) and DBE (Invesco DB Energy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - MMCA is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by IndexIQ, while DBE is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. MMCA is actively managed, while DBE is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MMCA returned 3.51%/yr vs 17.16%/yr for DBE. Their -0.11 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. MMCA charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBE.
Performance
MMCA vs. DBE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMCA achieves a -0.40% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 78.87% return.
MMCA
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -1.77%
- 6M
- -1.28%
- YTD
- -0.40%
- 1Y
- 3.45%
- 3Y*
- 3.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -0.13%
DBE
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- 21.13%
- 6M
- 53.89%
- YTD
- 78.87%
- 1Y
- 68.62%
- 3Y*
- 17.16%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- 13.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.52%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.24M | $1.18M | $1.76M | |
| $492.44K | $438.66K | $542.17K |
MMCA vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMCA IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF | -0.40% | 5.74% | 1.70% | 5.77% | -12.15% | -0.13% |
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund | 78.87% | -2.17% | 2.96% | -12.14% | 33.77% | 6.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMCA and DBE is -0.36, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2021 | -0.11 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between MMCA and DBE has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.11 to -0.36, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMCA vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank
MMCA
DBE
MMCA vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMCA) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MMCA | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.29 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 2.59 | -1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.51 | 8.14 | -4.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MMCA vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMCA drawdown since its inception was -16.04%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMCA and DBE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMCA | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.04% | -86.69% | +70.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.01% | -24.72% | +21.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.44% | -24.72% | +21.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -60.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.57% | -32.09% | +29.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.91% | -57.13% | +50.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.12% | 8.15% | -7.03% |
Volatility
MMCA vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMCA) is 0.90%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 14.12%. This indicates that MMCA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMCA | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.90% | 14.12% | -13.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.10% | 33.95% | -31.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.65% | 37.47% | -34.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.58% | 30.09% | -26.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.58% | 28.58% | -25.00% |
MMCA vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMCA has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
MMCA vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison
MMCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, more than DBE's 2.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund | 2.16% | 3.86% | 6.32% | 3.87% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.79% | 1.67% |
MMCA IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF | 3.29% | 3.39% | 3.66% | 3.57% | 2.90% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMCA and DBE have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBE has higher volatility (14.12%) compared to MMCA (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMCA dropped -16.04% vs DBE's -86.69%.
On 3-year performance, DBE leads with 17.16% vs 3.51% for MMCA. On fees, MMCA is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, MMCA has been the lower-risk option at 0.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DBE has performed better with a 17.16% return vs 3.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MMCA is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.
MMCA has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 2.16% for DBE.
MMCA is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while DBE is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: IndexIQ and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for MMCA and 0.78% for DBE.
DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MMCA and DBE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer