MMAX vs. NVDO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MMAX (iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF) and NVDO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MMAX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for NVDO.

Performance

MMAX vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF (MMAX) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMAX achieves a 3.09% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 18.85% return.

MMAX

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 3.09%
• 6M: 3.75%
• 1Y: 7.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NVDO

• 1D: -2.46%
• 1M: 14.15%
• YTD: 18.85%
• 6M: 29.58%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMAX vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF	3.09%	2.45%
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF	18.85%	11.12%

Correlation

The correlation between MMAX and NVDO is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025	0.43

Return for Risk

MMAX vs. NVDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMAX

MMAX Risk / Return Rank: 99
MMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
MMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
MMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
MMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMAX vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF (MMAX) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MMAX	NVDO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	5.52	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	10.56	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.51	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	22.49	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	112.49	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MMAX	NVDO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.13	1.30	+1.83

Drawdowns

MMAX vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMAX drawdown since its inception was -1.93%, smaller than the maximum NVDO drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMAX and NVDO.

Drawdown Indicators

	MMAX	NVDO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.93%	-16.25%	+14.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	-2.68%	+2.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.10%	-4.99%	+4.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.07%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MMAX	NVDO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.36%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.96%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.39%	31.93%	-30.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.49%	31.93%	-29.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.49%	31.93%	-29.44%

MMAX vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMAX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

MMAX vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison

MMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than NVDO's 14.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
MMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF	1.27%	1.31%
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF	14.02%	16.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MMAX and NVDO in my portfolio?

MMAX and NVDO have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MMAX or NVDO?

On fees, MMAX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MMAX or NVDO?

MMAX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for NVDO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MMAX or NVDO?

NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 14.02%, compared with 1.27% for MMAX.

What is the main difference between MMAX and NVDO?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MMAX and 0.77% for NVDO.