MLXIX vs. SRV
MLXIX (Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund) and SRV (NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MLXIX returned 11.11%/yr vs 12.37%/yr for SRV. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MLXIX charges 1.43%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for SRV.
Performance
MLXIX vs. SRV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLXIX achieves a 29.37% return, which is significantly lower than SRV's 34.33% return. Over the past 10 years, MLXIX has underperformed SRV with an annualized return of 11.11%, while SRV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.37% annualized return.
MLXIX
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- -5.83%
- YTD
- 29.37%
- 6M
- 29.12%
- 1Y
- 17.94%
- 3Y*
- 23.61%
- 5Y*
- 19.55%
- 10Y*
- 11.11%
SRV
- 1D
- 1.84%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- YTD
- 34.33%
- 6M
- 37.01%
- 1Y
- 43.63%
- 3Y*
- 29.97%
- 5Y*
- 26.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.37%
MLXIX vs. SRV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLXIX Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund | 29.37% | -8.56% | 45.26% | 15.34% | 27.02% | 42.04% | -20.02% | 12.05% | -18.48% | -13.83% |
SRV NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund | 34.33% | 5.05% | 50.70% | 19.88% | 20.11% | 50.45% | -41.65% | 33.99% | -21.61% | -4.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLXIX and SRV is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2014 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MLXIX and SRV has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLXIX vs. SRV — Risk / Return Rank
MLXIX
SRV
MLXIX vs. SRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX) and NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MLXIX | SRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.40 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 3.34 | -2.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.57 | 9.49 | -6.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MLXIX vs. SRV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLXIX drawdown since its inception was -76.78%, smaller than the maximum SRV drawdown of -92.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLXIX and SRV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLXIX | SRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.78% | -92.97% | +16.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.44% | -13.13% | -2.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.14% | -26.26% | +4.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.14% | -26.26% | +4.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.63% | -81.70% | +9.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.27% | -6.29% | -0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.12% | -48.64% | +25.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.96% | 4.61% | +3.35% |
Volatility
MLXIX vs. SRV - Volatility Comparison
Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX) and NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV) have volatilities of 7.46% and 7.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLXIX | SRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.46% | 7.60% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.47% | 15.83% | +0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.51% | 19.35% | +1.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.48% | 26.45% | -3.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.13% | 38.30% | -10.17% |
MLXIX vs. SRV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLXIX has a 1.43% expense ratio, which is higher than SRV's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
MLXIX vs. SRV - Dividend Comparison
MLXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.89%, less than SRV's 15.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLXIX Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund | 6.89% | 8.26% | 5.02% | 6.67% | 7.15% | 8.26% | 14.52% | 15.93% | 15.62% | 11.37% | 8.76% | 11.47% |
SRV NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund | 15.38% | 19.31% | 12.85% | 15.56% | 8.85% | 4.72% | 12.05% | 10.59% | 12.73% | 9.07% | 7.95% | 11.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MLXIX and SRV have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRV has higher volatility (7.60%) compared to MLXIX (7.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLXIX dropped -76.78% vs SRV's -92.97%.
SRV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MLXIX and SRV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer