PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLTIX vs. FFSZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLTIX vs. FFSZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Lifetime 2030 Fund (MLTIX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLTIX achieves a 4.40% return, which is significantly lower than FFSZX's 13.30% return.


MLTIX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.22%
YTD
4.40%
6M
4.97%
1Y
11.84%
3Y*
10.39%
5Y*
5.01%
10Y*
7.91%

FFSZX

1D
0.29%
1M
4.13%
YTD
13.30%
6M
15.66%
1Y
31.22%
3Y*
20.82%
5Y*
10.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLTIX vs. FFSZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MLTIX
MFS Lifetime 2030 Fund
4.40%10.82%8.32%12.48%-13.80%12.81%11.85%6.26%
FFSZX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6
13.30%24.08%14.41%20.78%-18.05%16.81%18.36%9.18%

Correlation

The correlation between MLTIX and FFSZX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2019

0.94

The correlation between MLTIX and FFSZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLTIX vs. FFSZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLTIX
MLTIX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
MLTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
MLTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

FFSZX
FFSZX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FFSZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFSZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFSZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FFSZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFSZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLTIX vs. FFSZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Lifetime 2030 Fund (MLTIX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLTIXFFSZXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.29

2.51

-0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.37

3.45

-0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.47

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

3.24

-0.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.70

14.53

-2.83

MLTIX vs. FFSZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLTIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the FFSZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLTIX and FFSZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLTIXFFSZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

2.51

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.70

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.80

-0.33

Drawdowns

MLTIX vs. FFSZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLTIX drawdown since its inception was -52.93%, which is greater than FFSZX's maximum drawdown of -31.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLTIX and FFSZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLTIXFFSZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.93%

-31.00%

-21.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.51%

-9.77%

+5.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.07%

-15.36%

+8.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.27%

-27.17%

+7.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.26%

-5.81%

-0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

2.18%

-1.15%

Volatility

MLTIX vs. FFSZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Lifetime 2030 Fund (MLTIX) is 1.64%, while Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX) has a volatility of 4.27%. This indicates that MLTIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFSZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLTIXFFSZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.64%

4.27%

-2.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.17%

10.54%

-6.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.26%

12.77%

-7.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.25%

15.01%

-6.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.90%

17.06%

-7.16%

MLTIX vs. FFSZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLTIX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FFSZX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLTIX vs. FFSZX - Dividend Comparison

MLTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.71%, more than FFSZX's 5.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFSZX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6
5.05%3.82%2.92%2.26%8.99%7.98%2.41%1.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MLTIX
MFS Lifetime 2030 Fund
8.71%9.09%8.22%3.98%6.47%8.95%3.92%5.46%5.72%3.85%7.14%3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, MLTIX and FFSZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFSZX has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to MLTIX (1.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLTIX dropped -52.93% vs FFSZX's -31.00%.

FFSZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLTIX and FFSZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer