MLSS vs. FATN
MLSS (Milestone Scientific Inc.) and FATN (FatPipe, Inc) are both stocks. MLSS operates in Medical Instruments & Supplies (Healthcare), while FATN operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past year, MLSS returned -42.69% vs -38.43% for FATN. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MLSS vs. FATN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLSS achieves a 39.89% return, which is significantly lower than FATN's 164.85% return.
MLSS
- 1D
- 7.58%
- 1M
- 9.11%
- 6M
- 29.94%
- YTD
- 39.89%
- 1Y
- -42.69%
- 3Y*
- -29.50%
- 5Y*
- -28.33%
- 10Y*
- -18.21%
FATN
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -11.57%
- 6M
- 152.36%
- YTD
- 164.85%
- 1Y
- -38.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MLSS vs. FATN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MLSS Milestone Scientific Inc. | 39.89% | -68.98% |
FATN FatPipe, Inc | 164.85% | -68.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLSS and FATN is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2025 | 0.03 |
Fundamentals
MLSS:
$33.78M
FATN:
$75.04M
MLSS:
-$0.08
FATN:
$0.08
MLSS:
3.52
FATN:
4.92
MLSS:
$8.93M
FATN:
$15.13M
MLSS:
$6.40M
FATN:
$13.71M
MLSS:
-$6.49M
FATN:
$2.19M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLSS vs. FATN — Risk / Return Rank
MLSS
FATN
MLSS vs. FATN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Milestone Scientific Inc. (MLSS) and FatPipe, Inc (FATN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MLSS | FATN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.06 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.68 | -0.51 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.96 | -0.72 | -0.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MLSS vs. FATN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLSS drawdown since its inception was -99.77%, which is greater than FATN's maximum drawdown of -88.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLSS and FATN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLSS | FATN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.77% | -88.85% | -10.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.03% | -83.69% | +20.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -81.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.55% | -58.85% | -40.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -91.21% | -60.73% | -30.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.28% | 60.18% | -14.90% |
Volatility
MLSS vs. FATN - Volatility Comparison
Milestone Scientific Inc. (MLSS) has a higher volatility of 25.47% compared to FatPipe, Inc (FATN) at 23.13%. This indicates that MLSS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FATN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLSS | FATN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.47% | 23.13% | +2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 61.75% | 114.25% | -52.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.32% | 149.13% | -60.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 84.94% | 180.96% | -96.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 87.52% | 180.96% | -93.44% |
Dividends
MLSS vs. FATN - Dividend Comparison
Neither MLSS nor FATN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
MLSS vs. FATN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Milestone Scientific Inc. and FatPipe, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MLSS and FATN have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MLSS has higher volatility (25.47%) compared to FATN (23.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLSS dropped -99.77% vs FATN's -88.85%.
FATN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.29 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MLSS and FATN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer